Sunday, July 23, 2023

Homicide in the House


Book: Homicide in the House: Washington Whodunit #2

Basic Information : Synopsis : Characters : Thoughts : Evaluation : Book Group : Good QuotesReferences

Basic Information:

Author: Colleen J. Shogan

Edition: epub on Libby from the Los Angeles Public Library

Publisher: Camel Press

ISBN: 258

Start Date: July 20, 2023

Read Date: July 23, 2023

258 pages

Genre:  Fiction, Mystery

Language Warning:  None

Rated Overall: 3  out of 5


Fiction-Tells a good story: 3 out of 5

Fiction-Character development: 3 out of 5



Synopsis (Caution: Spoiler Alert-Jump to Thoughts):

Kit Marshall now works for Representative Dixon from North Carolina. Dixon finds a very important staffer killed with the Speaker’s gavel. She is the prime suspect. Kit tracks down the the murderer from very little clues. At the end she is associated and abducted by the murderer. She manages to free herself and gets the murderer apprehended.



Cast of Characters:
  • Maeve Dixon-Freshman representative from North Carolina, accused of murder of Jack Drysdale. Ex-military. Very literal.
  • Kit Marshall-Maeve Dixon’s Legislative Director
  • Dan-Chief of Staff for Maeve Dixon’s office. Naive and easily panicked.
  • Jack Drysdale-Chief of Staff for the Speaker of the House, most powerful Congressional staffer, terse and somewhat a bully. Murder victim
  • Jordan Macintyre-Jack Drysdale’s husband. Popular chef
  • Doug Hollingsworth-live-in boyfriend of Kit Marshall
  • Meg Peters-friend of Kit Marshall
  • Judy Talent-chief of staff of a powerful representative, rival of Drysdale
  • Trevor-intelligent semi-friend of Kit Marshall. Lobbyist for a powerful defense contractor
  • Trent Roscoe- assistant to the Sergeant of Arms for the House of Representatives
  • Gareth Pressler-Sergeant of Arms for the House of Representatives
  • Detective O’Halloran-investigating murder of Jack Drysdale
  • Hill Rat-an anonymous blogger who mysteriously knew everybody’s secret
  • Clarence-Kit and Doug’s beagle
  • Melinda Gomez-Former student of Doug. Assistant Superintendent in the press gallery

Thoughts:

Shogan does good descriptions of life in Washington DC and particularly the Capitol area. She should. She worked as a Congressional staffer before becoming head of the National Archives.


The author continues what she does in the first book-naming all the great, and not so great, detective sleuths she can think of.


The adversarial relationship between Doug and Meg seems forced and contrived.


Places Mentioned:



Chapter One

Sets the scene that the Federal Government is about to shut down because there is an impasse between the the parties in Congress and the President. It is a time of rising tensions.


Homespun constituents-What is this? What is she talking about? Almost sounds derogatory towards the people whom a Congressperson is representing.


Dixon was getting pressure to toe the party line. She wanted to make sure her District was behind her. Kit was appointed lead to talk to the Speaker’s office.


Chapter Two

Day one of the shutdown. Kit gets to the office early after a long night at the office.


Chapter Four

Congressperson Dixon would listen to the Speaker's proposal, but say she will consider it-that is Kit’s plan. In the meantime, Clarence, Kit and Doug’s dog was being entered in a dog popularity contest. While Dixon met with the Speaker, Kit was meeting with Drysdale. Drysdale was putting the vote in a political perspective rather than a how is this responsible way to spend. Drysdale was unsatisfied with Kit’s answer. He confronts Dixon. Is not happy with Dixon either. He confronts her and there is even a physical element to it.


Members of the majority party in the House of Representatives took turns serving as the presiding officer of floor debate. Freshmen spent more time “in the chair” than senior legislators. Dixon was tapped to serve here while the Speaker was away.


Chapter Five

Kit is told that Dixon is in trouble. Meet her in the Capitol Rotunda. When Kit finds her there, 30 minutes after getting the message. Detective O’Halloran is there with Dixon. Drysdale is there, dead.


Chapter Six

Dixon is the leading suspect: motive-the fight yesterday, opportunity, and weapon-the Speaker’s gavel. Kit talks to O’Hallaron. Dan, her boss, and Dixon’s chief of staff, assigns Kit the task of solving the murder.


Chapter Seven

Two possible suspects: Judy Talent-Drysdale chief rival-and Gareth Pressler-Sergeant of Arms, whom Drysdale turned down the request for security reforms. Meg adds Jordan Macintyre to the list of suspects

 

Reason why Dixon was at the Rotunda that morning was that Dan had gotten a message saying it was from Jack to meet him at the Rotunda. It was a set up. The call was made from the Capitol Visitor Center.


Chapter Eight

The question Shogan asks is why would this call be placed to Dan from the Visitor Center? Why not Kit? And who placed the call? My question is, why didn’t Dan come forward to Dective O’Halloran and show him the phone? And why didn’t the police look at the tapes to see who was in the Visitor Center then? Seems rather weak to me.


Kit talks to Melinda. They met in a Cafeteria for a snack and information. Shogan’s comment is that It takes forever to make a difference around here.[Congress] … congressional achievements were measured not in days, months, or even years, but decades. Interesting divergent thoughts from Shogan. Do not be too fixated on the right now, but look at the general trend.


Melinda says the press thinks that the guy behind the Hill Rat blog is behind the murder. Drysdale had threatened to expose the anonymous blogger.


Chapter Nine

Kit mentions setting up a meeting at We The Pizza which Spike Mendelsohn runs. When we were in DC, we ate at Good Stuff Eatery in Georgetown. This is one of Mendlesohn’s restaurants. Also we have his cookbook.


She has a chance meeting with Trevor, her former officemate from the first book. Kit tells Trevor that Dixon might be a suspect and had found the body. Trevor has contacts which will help Kit investigate.


Chapter Ten

She researches the Speaker’s gavel in the Library of Congress and discovers that at any one time there may be more than one gavel-a set of spares in case one breaks.


Chapter Eleven

Lunch with Judy Talent. Kept herself well. If I could guess, I’d wager that Judy’s intensity pervaded her whole existence—her work, appearance, and personal relationships. She questions Judy about Drysdale.


Chapter Twelve

Kit meets with Trent Roscoe, ostentatiously about House security. But Kit is trying to figure out a way to find if Trent’s boss is involved with Drysdales murder.


Chapter Fifteen

Clarence, Kit and Doug’s dog had a popularity contest which raised money for a dog shelter. They are at a celebration for it. Kit talks to Jordan MacIntyre. Kit questions him. Jordan figures out that she works with the prime suspect of the killer of his husband. Jordan looks threatening. Clarence lunges for him and then goes after the pizza.


Chapter Sixteen

Clarence’s Top Dog award was rescinded because of the chaos he caused. The three go out for an after meeting at a bistro. Jordan is a suspect because of the money he will be inheriting, enabling him to open his own restaurant.


Doug talks about Occam’s razor. He says this points to Dixon doing it. He thinks that is the simplest solution. How to come up with something else to say Dixon did not do it? Come up with an explanation with fewer assumptions than the scenario I offered. Once you’re able to come up with that version of events, you’ve got your killer.


Chapter Eighteen

Contains the book title. Hill Rat broke the story on how Drysdale was killed. Trent will ask Kit for a date.


Chapter Twenty One

Kit is going on a date with Trent. She visits the shop where the gavels are made. She is the second person asking about gavels that day. The first was from the Sergeant at Arms office and not Garreth.


I blew out a long breath. Lying had never been my strong suit, but lately, the deceptions rolled off my tongue smooth as butter. I think this is true. The more you do something, the easier it becomes. Whether it is lying or sinning and building.


Chapter Twenty Two

Kit goes to Trent’s office. She sets up a fake call (Fake A Call). She uses a call, which turns out to be real to look in Gareth’s office. Everything seems OK.


Chapter Twenty Three

Kit thinks it is Gareth who killed Drysdale.


Chapter Twenty Four

The spare gavel is missing from the rostrum on the Speakers dias.


Chapter Twenty Five

Dan quit as chief of staff. Kit is on her way to her office to meet with O’Halloran. She gets accosted in a deserted hallway by the murderer and is abducted into a deserted cafeteria where she is bound and gagged.


Chapter Twenty Six

This part seems really lame. The murderer leaves her alone. She manages to free herself. Then chases after the murderer with the idea of drawing attention to him. Clarence stops the murderer.



Evaluation:

 Essentially if you read Shogan’s first mystery, Stabbing in the Senate, this is a repeat. It has a slightly different setting-the House of Representatives vs the Senate, and how the murder takes place. But the same main characters are part of the story.


I was interested in seeing if Shogan’s writing improved with practice or was her first book representative of her writing. She relies on much the same style and techniques-naming characters from the pantheon of recognized detectives. The relationships between characters seemed either forced or stilted.


For a quick summer read, this is an OK read. For something which will stimulate your gray cells, read some other mystery. (One redeeming part of the book is that she names several places to eat. If you are going to DC, this might be a decent guide to those kinds of establishments.)



 
Notes from my book group:

How do you want your life to change because you read this book?



Many of these questions are either from or adapted from LitLovers.

Why the title of Homicide in the House?

Does this story work as a mystery?

Did the ending seem fitting? Satisfying? Predictable?

Which character was the most convincing? Least?

Which character did you identify with?

Which one did you dislike?

Every story has a world view. Were you able to identify this story’s world view? What was it? How did it affect the story?

Why do you think the author wrote this book?

What would you ask the author if you had a chance?

What “takeaways” did you have from this book?

Describe the culture talked about in the book.

How is the culture described in this book different than where we live?

What economic or political situations are described?

Does the author examine economics and politics, family traditions, the arts, religious beliefs, language or food?

How did this book affect your view of the world?

Of how God is viewed?

What questions did you ask yourself after reading this book?

Talk about specific passages that struck you as significant—or interesting, profound, amusing, illuminating, disturbing, sad...?

What was memorable?

Reading Groups General Fiction Guide



Good Quotes:
  • First Line: The digital clock blinked an irritating red, glaring “11:59” in block numerals.
  • Last Line: Quite appropriately, the nighttime illumination of the Capitol caused my newly adorned ring finger to sparkle.
 
References:

Saturday, July 8, 2023

Stabbing in the Senate - Washington Whodunit #1

Book: Stabbing in the Senate - Washington Whodunit #1

Basic Information : Synopsis : Characters : Expectations : Thoughts : Evaluation : Good Quotes : References

Basic Information:

Author: Colleen J. Shogan

Edition: ePub on Libby from the Los Angeles Public Library

Publisher: Camel Press

ISBN: 9781603813310 (ISBN10: 1603813314)

Start Date: July 5, 2023

Read Date: July 8, 2023

236 pages

Genre:  Fiction, Mystery

Language Warning:  None

Rated Overall: 3  out of 5


Fiction-Tells a good story: 3 out of 5

Fiction-Character development: 3 out of 5



Synopsis:

Kit comes in a little early to deliver a paper to Senator Lansford. She finds him stabbed with a model helicopter. She is a suspect and works on clearing her name with an office mate, Meg.


Story goes through how they figure out the suspects and eliminate them. The story ends with Kit being attacked by the murderer in the subway running under the Capitol building and the murderer being arrested.



Cast of Characters:
  • Kit Marshall -Staffer of Senator Langsford’s office. Main person who solves the crime
  • Senator Lyndon Langsford-The murdered Senator
  • Vivian Langsford-The Senator’s wife who had the money in the family
  • Meg Peters-Office mate of Kit. Helps to solve the murder. Very attractive woman
  • Doug-Partner of Kit, Georgetown professor of history, author
  • Senator Regan-friend of Langsford but also on opposite sides of an important bill
  • Representative Jordan Jessup-conservative representative from the same state as Langsford. Will be appointed Senator after Langsford’s death.
  • Jeff Prentice-lobbyist for Carter Powell
  • Vivian Langsford-Senator Langsford’s wife, wealthy
  • Matt Rocker-policy person for the Senator’s office
  • Trevor-another office staffer who is a bit aloof, without social skills
  • Kara-scheduler for the Senator
  • Lucinda Porter-chief of staff
  • Mandy Lippman-Senator Langsford spokesperson
  • O'Halloran-Capitol Police detective in charge of the murder case
  • Kyle Tarnoff-Representative Jessops chief of staff
  • Henrik-Vivian Langsford’s trainer and lover
  • Carter Powell-Not a person, but a defense contractor who is up for a contract with the Federal government.


Expectations:
  • Recommendation: NPR
  • When: July 5, 2023
  • Date Became Aware of Book: July 5, 2023
  • Why do I want to read this book: We visited the National Archives this Spring. Recently the author was selected as the head of the National Archives. I am wondering how good of an author she is.
  • What do I think I will get out of it? A good summer read.

Thoughts:

As I said above, I was not looking for the great American murder mystery. Nor did I get it. This was an enjoyable read for me as I was struggling through another couple of books. I just wanted to have something to enjoy for a little while.


Some of my thoughts are that there were a lot of cliche moments here. Such as when Kit finds the recycle bin slightly askew. She finds a paper she had just put into the Senator’s desk when she discovered that the Senator had been murdered. (pulled the paper and was surprised to see my memo, the one I had carried into Langsford’s office earlier today) Or the mysterious voice on the phone. Or in the last part of the book, a fight. And then there is the protagonist to the story is able to solve the “who killed the Senator” in ways the professional police cannot.


And then there is the unbelievable. When Kit tells her accomplice that she knows who the murderer is. But the murderer is close enough to her that the murderer hears her. Or a chief of staff would be blabbing what her boss says is to be quiet about to everybody who she knows it seems like.


And then there is the naming of the mystery novel gods. From Agatha Christie to Dorothy Sayers-I will admit my heart skipped a beat when Lord Peter Whimsey (Follow up on some leads’? Do I need to remind you that you’re a Senate staffer, not Lord Peter) was named.


The author can be repetitive in the telling of her story and not in a subtle way. She has a tendency to tell rather than show at times.


And there are other references which either political junkies or local people would remember. Such as Gary Condit and Chandra Levy-they were local Central Valley people: Condit was accused of killing Levy, but it took several years to unravel that it was somebody else who did.


So much of the book is cheesy.


The author reviews motives: First, you have a power motive. Carter Power, to be exact. If Langsford backed the company, several people would stand to benefit, not just financially but by proving their influence and their ability to get things done. Second, there’s the political motive. Several people would move up in the world, one to the Senate. Third, you have a personal or financial motive, such as the insurance money



A couple interesting comments she makes:

  • It’s almost impossible for outsiders to understand the inner workings of a political circle. Isn’t that true of almost all specialty occupations? Or at least those within the occupations think so?
  • Living in the Washington, D.C., region has a lot of positives, yet amazing cuisine isn’t one of them. I am not a great connoisseur of high class food. We were just in DC this Spring. While we visited places to eat which were enjoyable, none really stood out as being exception or something we could only get in that region.
  • Freedom Trail in Boston. Since the Senator is from Boston, this stands to reason that he would bring friends to walk this trail in Boston. It would have been a bit startling to see that he took a friend along the Black Freedom Trail.
  • Several references which this Spring I became acquainted with on a visit to DC. Such as Union Station, the Metro and a few other places.


One thing Shogan says which is a bit of an eye opener is how staffers become lobbyists and lobbyists become staffers very quickly.



Evaluation:

I was looking for a quick, easy summer time read when I came across an article that the Nation Archivist was a mystery writer. So I checked out her first mystery book from the library. It did not disappoint in being a quick read. It fit what I wanted perfectly.


Having said that, just be aware, this is her first book and it shows the lack of experience in writing this type of a story. Many of the clue are given repeatedly and in obvious ways. The writing style, while not bad, does not rise to any of the really good writers.


Still it served what I wanted and I will probably read her second book just to see if she improves or not.



Good Quotes:

First Line: Ascending from the underground depths of the Metro, I confronted the alabaster dome in the distance.

Last Line: Me, too!



References: