Sunday, October 21, 2018

48 House in Boston

Book: 48 House in Boston
Basic Information : Evaluation : References

Basic Information:
Author: Brandon Presser
Edition: eBook on OverDrive from the Fresno County Library
Publisher: Lonely Planet
Start Date: September 9, 2018
Read Date: October 21, 2018
40 pages
Genre: Travel Book
Language Warning: None
Rated Overall: 2 out of 5



Expectations:
Recommendation: None
Date Became Aware of Book: September 9, 2018
How come do I want to read this book: Looking for a travel book about Boston
What do I think I will get out of it? A concise guide to must see places in Bos


Evaluation:
I was hoping to get a concise guide to Boston for an upcoming trip from 48 Hours in Boston. While I feel like I got some places which was good to go to, on the whole I was disappointed in what it lacked-a list of places and why I would like to see them. You can go to other places, or even just Google the books name and get as much or more. Even though, I thought the warning on the Cheers bar was good and worth reading.

 
Table of Contents:
  • Contents
  • 48 House in Boston
  • Behind the Scenes

References:


    Monday, October 15, 2018

    Finding Gobi

    Book:Finding Gobi
    Basic Information : Synopsis : Characters : Expectations : Thoughts : Evaluation : Book Group : Good Quotes : References

    Basic Information:
     
    Author: Dion Leonard
    Edition: eBook on OverDrive from the Fresno County Public Library
    Publisher: HarperCollins
    ISBN: 0008227950 (978-0008227951)
    ASIN: B01N5FAUIJ
    Start Date: October 12, 2018
    Read Date: October 15, 2018
    239 pages
    Genre: Biography
    Language Warning: None
    Rated Overall: 3 out of 5


    Synopsis (Caution: Spoiler Alert-Jump to Thoughts):
    Dion Leonard is a ultra-distance runner. He was running in a six day, long distance race, when a small dog started to run with him-through two marathon distance days. Dion Leonard becomes attached to the dog and names him Gobi, for the place they were running-the Gobi Desert. But to get Gobi out of China, he has to go through several steps, some to leave China and some to enter the United Kingdom.

    This forces Leonard to leave Gobi behind for at least thirty days in the care of one of the support staff of the long distance run. Leonard starts a fundraiser to help fund getting Gobi to the UK. But in the meantime, Gobi goes missing-through either normal doggie escape tactics or more nefarious reasons.

    This forces Leonard to go back to China to help find Gobi. Now comes the waiting to get an exit visa and the paperwork to enter the UK. Leonard is thinking that everybody is trying to kidnap Gobi, so he become very protective (paranoid?) and stays with Gobi almost constantly and is suspicious of anything strange that happens.

    He finally waits the proper time and all the tests for the various diseases come out negative. Leonard is allowed to take Gobi into the UK and they live happily ever after.



    Cast of Characters:
    • Dion Leonard-author, long distance runner, owner of Gobi, Australian
    • Gobi-dog
    • Lucja-wife, from Belgium
    • Kiki Chen-pet advocate in China. Principle person for finding a way to get Gobi out of China
    • Chris Barden-minor character, but organizer of search party for Gobi
    • Lu Xin-head of search party in Urumqi
    • Jiuyen (lil)-medical doctor student who though quiet was able to confront those who were obstructing the search
    • Ma family-found Gobi
    • Jonathan Brown-Daily Mirror reported who first made the story famous
    • Richard Henson-long distance runner, bunkmate, helped right Dion’s mind while searching
    • Tommy Chen-world class long distance runner


    Expectations:
    Recommendation: OSHER Book Group
    When: Fall 2018
    Date Became Aware of Book: May 2018
    How come do I want to read this book: Because of book group
    What do I think I will get out of it? Unknown, but low expectations


    Thoughts:
    The race which Leonard depicts is called the Gobi March. The next Gobi March, as of this writing, is July 28, 2019. The course roughly follows the footsteps of the Great Genghis Khan with the race ending Karakorum, the 13th and 14th century capital of Genghis Khan’s Empire, in the vast steppe. (From the 4Deserts site.)


    Prologue
    He ends the prologue by saying that finding Gobi was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done in my life… But being found by her--that was one of the best things. Interesting way to put things. Sometimes our lives are changed not by what we do, but by things which happen to us. How we react to these changes is what defines us as a person.

    He says that because of Gobi, he has felt fear and despair. This happens when you love something. When you think you can lose it, you go through these things. It is with the things you do not care about which causes you to continue on without changing course.


    Chapter 1
    Leonard defines what an ultra-marathon race is. Multi-day with around 25 miles or more a day-sometimes twice that amount in a day, in a grueling environment. People pay big money to do this.

    Why would someone want to run this kind of a race? The reward is to finish it.

    Leonard talks about the self-talk he does. He runs it to reach the top of his competition. If he runs, he wants to at least place. After not accomplishing his goals last time, he is thinking about stopping these runs. So to him, if he cannot place, he does not want to run. Does not seem like he is running just to run, but more running to beat everyone else. Definitely not a passive person. He has a plan to either come in good here and continue on doing good in a couple more races to reach the pinnacle of races, the Marathon des Sables.

    He has only been running three years. But during that time he had to take off eight months because of an injury. He feels this is time wasted (chp 2). He was 37 years old when he started running competitively (chp3). Which puts him about 40 at the time of this story.

    This kind of running is more of a mental exercise than physical bruising. Even though it is physically trying. When my wife did the JMT several years ago, I told her the first week is physically demanding. But after that, it is her mind which will matter much more. I envision this kind of running, this kind of effort is similar, but very much more intense.


    Chapter 2
    Leonard describes his childhood, where he grew up believing the man whom his mother married was his Dad. After he died, his Mom rather abruptly tells him this is not true. He noted that the four words, Garry wasn’t your dad ripped his heart out, throwing his life into chaos. He then talks about how he was ostracised in the town he lived. This caused him to become more and more disruptive to his schooling and in his relationship to his mother. But he does not talk about why town turned on him.

    Lists what he carries-less than 20 pounds:
    • Food
    • Bedding
    • No change of clothes
    • No mat
    • No book
    • No phone
    Leonard is highly regimented, trying to reduce the variations which can affect his race. Eat dinner at 6:30pm so not to waste energy for the next day. Do not waste energy socializing, so he falls asleep before his tent mates come in.


    Chapter 3
    Leonard has an inferiority complex when it comes to running. He sees other runners and wonders what is he doing there. He makes it through a race because of grit not elegance or love. He does have a paragraph where he nicely describes running as a beautiful thing-finding rhythm between the legs and lungs. Experiencing freedom, peace and the moment. He is not one of those runners who runs for the love of it. He is a competitor, a racer.

    He talks about how he is an individual, rather than a team player. He played cricket, but was too upset at his teammates to continue.

    I knew that the race was going to be won or lost in my head. … avoid distraction.


    Chapter 5
    Etiquette-if a runner makes a mistake and goes the wrong way, then you try to get the person back on track. You also wait for them until they return to their place in the race. This does not seem like the ultra competitiveness of our society where a person makes a mistake and they get walked over.

    Leonard talks about the effect heat has on him. In his youth, when he fully exerted himself, playing sports, he found that the louder the heart, the quieter the sadness. In his running, he felt that he was no longer running to get away from my past. I was running toward my future. I was running with hope, not sorrow.


    Chapter 6
    Leonard and Gobi was starting to have a symbiotic relationship. By Gobi’s presence, she would give encouragement to Leonard. Over time, Leonard would feel responsible for Gobi’s needs.


    Chapter 9
    He tells about how his main competitor got dehydrated and was in a bad way. Leonard faced the decision-to win, but ignore him, or stop and help and not win. What price is worth winning? To Leonard, the potential for someone dying was too steep of a price.

    The unknown is always more intimidating than the familiar.

    He was also faced with the choice: what does he do with Gobi? He makes a decision which is out of character for him-bring her home with him. Little did he know what the cost would be. I suspect when we know the cost of something, we will decide that the reward is not worth the cost. Is it better to not know the cost in seeking something?


    Chapter 11
    Interesting to see how a journalist tracked down Leonard and his wife.

    Low expectations on fundraising.

    I will admit that I was feeling a bit uncharitable when I read the fundraising part. He has to pay thousands of dollars to run in the Gobi March, but he is asking others to fund getting a dog out? The next bit of being uncharitable was thinking why give so much money for one dog when there are many more people who could use the money to go beyond starvation to at least living. Even if you wanted to help dogs, was there no dogs in Scotland worthy of being saved? There is a hint of a Jesus story here. When Jesus is at dinner, a woman comes in and anointed his feet and hair with a costly perfume. The disciples grumble that the perfume could have been sold for big money and given to the poor. Jesus basically says you do not know what you are saying. This is the best use of this gift. So it may be said about this effort-do not grumble when love is around-it is irrational.


    Chapter 15
    Leonard admits that he had a bad start to life. He is dealing with it. But he is using the tools he learned as a child growing up to deal with pain, doubt, fear. Through his upbringing , he can block out these things, particularly through his running. I wonder if he is really dealing with his problems or ignoring them and hoping they will go away.


    Chapter 18
    Gobi is lost while they are going through the waiting time needed to get out of China. Leonard goes over to coordinate the search. He finds that his lone attach approach will not work in this case. He has to work as a team. Through this he sees he has to trust.


    Chapter 20
    Friendship-something when done right has no-strings attached.


    Chapter 21
    To be trusted … by a living creature is a powerful thing.


    Chapter 23
    This is the crux of the book-Did Gobi save Leonard? No and Leonard says as much. But he does know that Gobi has changed me. He is dealing with his past demons. By finding Gobi, Leonard no longer needs the long-distance running to work out the past. Through Gobi, I’ve found more of myself. That is the heart of the story.


    Chapter 24
    One of the insights which Leonard comes away with is that there is more, much more, to people as a group than both the surface and there reputation. He says that I saw in people only what I expected to see. He notes that the people of China that once they let you into their hearts and homes, they’re incredibly generous and unfailingly kind. I suspect this is true of most people. For the most part we all want to be viewed as generous, we are intimidated by the deceit we have faced before. The question is how can we get beyond that. The key I think is to see not people as a mass, but a person as an individual. To understand and see beyond the expectations.

    When we say yes to something, in Leonard’s case to Gobi, life becomes different. The question is what do we say yes to? Also by saying yes, often we are saying No to something else. While there is a need to be careful with our Yes’ and No’s, there is a case for love being something which is without reservation.


    Evaluation:
    This is a feel good story about a dog finding a man who would run with him. The twist to the story is that the man is an ultra-marathon runner and this is taking place in China, the Gobi desert in particular. The man is an Australian living in Scotland with a Belgium wife. His tale talks about how the dog finds the man, the man’s adventures in getting the dog out of China, and how the man comes to understand himself better.

    This is a fast, easy, pick me up read, with a predictable happy ending. We all need these at times. But there are a some insights which one can learn about their world and about themselves. So just enjoy the read.

     
    Notes from my book group:


    Many of these questions are either from or adapted from LitLovers.
    • Why the title of Finding Gobi?
      • What does it mean?
    • Does this story work as a feel good story?
      • Is there a deeper meaning?
    • Had you heard about ultra-marathons before this book? Did it sound appealing to you? What kind of a person runs this kind of race? What are the requirements to run this kind of a race?
    • Leonard talks about his running being in his head and that part of his effort is to avoid distractions. (chp 3). What are the benefits of this approach? The draw back?
    • In chapter 5, Leonard describes the etiquette of what happens when a person makes a mistake and runs the wrong way. Is this taking etiquette too far? How would that play out in our American culture?
      • Later on another runner keeps on running and avoids a hard part of the race. Leonard talks to the organizers about this. Was leonard a tattle tell? Or trying to keep the race fair? How does the other runner take it?
    • Also in chapter 5, he says that I was no longer running to get away from my past. I was running toward my future. I was running with hope, not sorrow. Can you outrun your past? What happens when he no longer can run? How will he deal with his past?
    • What prize is worth another person dying? Leonard was faced with the quandry to win and ignore another competitor or not win and help. (As a note, 11 people died building the Golden Gate bridge-should it not have been built?)
    • Leonard decides to take Gobi back to Scotland without knowing what the obstacles would be. As it turns out there is a great deal of obstacles in achieving this objective. Would Leonard have made this decision if he knew what the obstacles were? How did Leonard grow as a person as he overcome these obstacles?
    • When Leonard finds out how much money it will take to get Gobi out of China, he opens a social funding site. How do we judge what is important enough to give money too? Why is giving money to save a single dog more important than giving money to save human lives? Or even many dogs?
    • Leonard notes that the people of China that once they let you into their hearts and homes, they’re incredibly generous and unfailingly kind. How can we get beyond what we see and into the heart of people?
    • Did the ending seem fitting? Satisfying? Predictable?
    • Characters:
      • Which character did you identify with?
      • Which one did you dislike?
    • Every story has a world view. Were you able to identify this story’s world view? What was it? How did it affect the story?
    • In what context was religion talked about in this book?
    • Why do you think the author wrote this book?
    • What would you ask the author if you had a chance?
    • What “take aways” did you have from this book?
    • What central ideas does the author present?
      • Are they personal, sociological, global, political, economic, spiritual?
      • What implications for you, our nation or the world do these idea’s have?
    • Describe the culture talked about in the book.
      • How is the culture described in this book different than where we live?
      • What economic or political situations are described?
      • Does the author examine economics and politics, family traditions, the arts, religious beliefs, language or food?
    • How did this book affect your view of the world?
      • What questions did you ask yourself after reading this book?
    • Talk about specific passages that struck you as significant—or interesting, profound, amusing, illuminating, disturbing, sad...?
      • What was memorable?

    Good Quotes:
      • First Line: The camera crew finished up last night.
      • Last Line: Let’s all go for a run
      • The unknown is always more intimidating than the familiar. Chp 9
      • To be trusted … by a living creature is a powerful thing. Chp 21
      • I saw in people only what I expected to see. Chp 24

        References:

            Tuesday, October 9, 2018

            Code Girls

            Book:  Code Girls: The Untold Story of the American Women Code Breakers of World War II
            Basic Information : Synopsis : Characters : Thoughts : Evaluation : Book Group : New Words : Book References : Good Quotes : Table of Contents : References

            Basic Information:
            Author: Liza Mundy
            Edition: eBook from the Fresno County Public Library
            Publisher: Hachette Books
            ISBN: 0316439894 (ISBN13: 9780316439893)
            Start Date: September 20, 2018
            Read Date: October 9, 2018
            416 pages
            Genre: History, Biography, World War II
            Language Warning: None
            Rated Overall: 3 out of 5

            History: 4 out of 5


            Synopsis (Caution: Spoiler Alert-Jump to Thoughts):

            This books traces the roots of women in code breaking in the United States War effort during World War II. It starts pre-World War II moves through recruitment of people for code breakers. When there was a major effort to replace the men who either worked as code breakers or the need to add a vast number of people to the effort, women were recruited. First the elite women intellects from major women’s colleges and then from other places which looked like likely possible fits.-such as teachers.

            The book then goes through the process of code breaking and the relationships which these women formed among their group. In the end, there were several thousand women who were part of this effort. The book continues on through the tediousness of breaking code, the frustrations of problem solving, the inspiration which allows a code to be broken, and the lives lived outside of the confines of the particular facilities they worked in.

            The book also talks about the friendly rivalry between the Army and Navy’s code breaking groups. Also the relationships between the US code breakers and England.

            This was a great deal of secrecy involved. They could not talk to outsiders. Even talk among the internal divisions was not encouraged-you wondered if this would have sped up the process of could breaking. Then there was the successes. The shooting down of Yamamoto’s plane, the battle of Midway, the understanding of diplomatic cables all were talked about.



            Cast of Characters:
            Agnes Meyer Driscoll-cracking the Japanese Navy fleet codes in the 1920’s and 30’s.
            Elizebeth Smith Friedman-helped found first government code-breaking bureau.
            Genevieve Grotjan-math professor. Broke code which allowed Allies to listen in on the Japanese diplomatic communications
            Dorothy Ramale-codebreaker
            Mary Court
            Jacqueline Jenkins
            Gwynneth Gminder
            Fran Steen
            Dot Braden
            Ann Caracristi
            Edith Reynolds
            Ruth “Crow” Weston
            Elizabeth Alen Butler
            Ruth Schoen Mirsky
            Georgia O’Connor Ludington
            And others




            Thoughts:

            Introduction: "Your country needs you, young ladies"
            Theme of the book: the women who worked in code-breaking were behind some of the significant individual code-breaking triumphs of World War II.

            By understanding an enemy’s code, it provides a way to know what the enemy is thinking, doing and antagonizing over.

            Half of those recruited actually passed their courses. The type of talent looked for was adept at math or science or foreign languages. Also needed to be dutiful and patriotic. Also this was not a glamorous job where they could tell what they were doing. Some of the women kept the secret for over 50 years after the war was over.


            Part I. "In the event of total war women will be needed"
            Twenty-eight acres of girls
            Talks about the stories of various of the code breakers.
            Such as Dot Braden. Her brother thought she possessed a highly analytical mind.


            "This is a man's size job, but I seem to be getting away with it"
            Another description of who these women were almost always school teachers, curious, brilliant, resourceful. Wanting to find an outlet for their intelligence.

            You could not be too concerned about reading other people’s mail. But isn’t that the whole point of this kind of operation?

            The author traces the World War II cryptography to a couple who picked up work after World War I. They even wrote books and had their own publishing company-Riverbank Publishing. The couple William Friedman and Elizebeth Smith Friedman. Also there was another couple who did a lot of cryptography- Parker and Genevieve Hitt.


            The most difficult problem
            Crossword puzzles are designed to be solved, while codes and ciphers are designed to prevent solution. At one time being able to do crossword puzzles was a sign that you might be good at cryptography. But Friedman’s thoughts as paraphrased above shows the opposite. Since crossword puzzles are meant to be solved, they give you hints and encourage you to the solution. But a cipher tries to lead you into the wrong paths and makes it more difficult to solve. He also understood that solving ciphers was much more like solving a math proof, so a good foundation of math, particularly statistics was of benefit to solving ciphers.


            "So many girls in one place"
            Charles Taft lays out the dimensions of the social upheaval World War II is bringing. Not just females coming into the workplace, but also minorities are coming in and doing jobs which formerly was only white male. How we react will be an indication of us as a society. This may be the biggest residue of World War II on America. There was no going back to how things were before. We needed to figure out a way to accommodate all of these changes.


            Part II. "Over all this vast expanse of waters Japan was supreme"
            "Q for communications"
            Congresswoman Edith Nourse Rogers started working on the Navy to admit women even before World War II. There was resistance to this, particularly from Admiral Nimitz. She was instrumental in getting the Army version going. I wonder about Mundy’s reference to her. She did not include the Edith. Oversight? She has included first names before. Did this little factoid just appear because it was interesting, but not researched?

            It was noted that there was concerns which today seems a bit ignorant, but seemed valid at the time, Such as a woman’s voice might be too soft to be used in an aircraft tower. As a note: my mother served in WWII as an air traffic controller as a WAVE.

            Why did women serve? Mundy says two reasons: 1) There were no males in the family eligible to serve; 2) They wanted to bring home their own men sooner. Was that the only two reasons?

            While it was the men who lead the groups who got the credit for breaking the codes in the Pacific, it was a group effort. Women outnumbered men in the groups. Since the book is about women code breakers, Mundy does not try to determine the importance of men vs women in each group. She does talk about how breaking the code in the Pacific was based upon Agnes Driscoll’s work. Gary’s note: I think very few breakthroughs happen in isolation. So it does not surprise me to have the statements about it being a group effort. Still the leader of a group usually gets the credit, even if the person is not the smartest or most talented. It is that person who leads a group to accomplish things.

            One of the main places which I did enjoy this book was when Mundy talked about the WAVES. She traces the effort to create the WAVES and the resistance for it. What was really interesting was how the uniforms were created. Josephine Ogden Forrestal-wife of James Forrestal the secretary of Navy pushed the design. She engaged a fashion house, Mainbocher to design the uniform. It was said the utility was sacrificed for looks-later corrected. A really good description of the way the WAVES uniform looked is n this chapter. Mundy makes a comment that some of the women decided to service in the WAVES instead of the WAACS. I can testify to this as my mother often repeated she went into the WAVES because of the uniform.


            "Hell's half-acre"
            What is the mind of an engineer? Also what kind of an engineer? I think what Mundy is saying is that Annie Caracristi could problem solve in an orderly manner.

            Mundy talks about the Army’s cryptographic unit as being a flat organization, both from the type of people who worked their, but also from the desperation of trying to crack Japanese codes. Ideas could come from anywhere.


            "It was only human to complain"
            One of the listening posts was at a place called Two Rocks Ranch which is near Petaluma. Now it is a Coast Guard training facility.

            ...they [women] discovered what workplaces are and have been since the dawn of time: places where one is annoyed and thwarted and underpaid and interrupted and underappreciated. Yep, sounds about right. Later on, Mundy gives examples of the gossip and issues. But for the most part they seem to be the normal issues facing any work places.


            Pencil-pushing mamas sink the shipping of Japan
            Mundy explains some terms in cryptography:
            • Sono-the part number of a message (first, second, …)
            • Indicator-which code book to use
            • Discriminant-what code was being used
            • GAT-Group as transmitted-the code group plus the cipher
            When a Japanese code book on Okinawa fell into Allied hands, the code breakers were able to figure out messages which lead the planners to expect over a million casualties on the Allied side would occur upon an invasion of any part of the Japanese main islands. thinks that this is what lead Truman to decide to drop the atomic bomb. For more of the thoughts and information Truman got, see the book, The Accidental President byA.J. Baine.


            Part III. The tide turns
            "Enemy landing at the mouth of the Seine"
            During the D-Day invasion, there was a feeling of great achievement. Going to church was the only way they could think of to honor the tragedy and loss, … Sometimes even when we know we have contributed to our maximum, our souls will reach out for something more.


            The surrender message
            On the day when Hiroshima was bombed, the intercept station at Two Rock Ranch could not hear the normally strong signal which came out of there. They were at a loss about why.


            Epilogue: The mitten.
            This is a good description of anyone, but Mundy applies it particularly to women: ...rather than as complicated human beings with quiet but rich interior lives. Don’t we wish that was a good label for ourselves?

            After the war, there was some people who continued on with cryptography in reading Russian communications.. One of these was called the Venona project. This enabled the Americans to understand and prosecute spies in America who were betraying the American spies against Russia.

            =========
            I am wondering what “take-aways” do I get from the book? Like the various other books like Hidden Figures, The Girls at Atomic City, and one I am currently reading, Sisters in Law, the authors would like you to understand that a woman could fulfill any man’s job. I am thinking this is a bit passe in the 21st century. While there is a glass ceiling, some of that is breaking. I think as more women rise through the ranks, this will go away as well.

            So will this book be worth reading in 20 years? Not as a book, but more as an attempt to gather a place where women were able to influence and change some of the course of World War II.

            I am also left to wonder, did any other nation use their women in this way? German’s, Russian’s, Japanese? British? … Or was the United States the only one? If so, what made the United States accepting of their input (accepting after the initial resistance.)?


            Evaluation:
             I wanted to like this book-cryptography is a fascinating subject. Telling untold stories draws me in. But I do not think the author did her job. She did extensive research on both the subject and the people involved. But where she failed was to focus me and make the people in the book compelling to me.

            There was so many stories she wanted to tell that for the most part, we got snippets of these women and their contributions. There are a few people whom a fuller story is told, but usually they are intertwined with the lesser stories. There is some confusion about the timeline. While told mostly chronologically, in places she jumps around without giving good warning. Consequently I would be wondering about where does this fit in.

            So will this book be worth reading in 20 years? Not as a book, but more as an attempt to gather a place where women were able to influence and change some of the course of World War II.



             
            Notes from my book group:
            The women of this book are titled as code breakers. But this is a general classification. What functions are involved in this process? What skills and/or mindset does it take to be a code breaker?

            Charles Taft notes in his introductory speech the racial and sexual turmoil World War II was leading into. Place yourself in that time. How would you have reacted to now working if you were a woman? Or working alongside a black or a woman if you were a while male? Did the United States handle this transition well? How could it have done better?

            What is the mind of an engineer? This is in reference to Mundy’s comment on why Annie Caracristi was a good code breaker.

            Mundy talks about the Army cryptology group as being a flat organization. So they got innovated thoughts. Why does a flat organization this? Why doesn’t any organization try to flatten their structure?

            How would you have improved this book?

            Many of these questions are either from or adapted from LitLovers.
            • Why the title of Code Girls? Is this a sexist title? Would it have been OK for a male author to have titled a book this way?
            • Does this history make sense to you?
            • Which characters were you most interested in?
            • Every story has a world view. Were you able to identify this story’s world view? What was it? How did it affect the story?
            • In what context was religion talked about in this book?
            • Why do you think the author wrote this book?
            • What would you ask the author if you had a chance?
            • What “take aways” did you have from this book?
            • What central ideas does the author present?
              • Are they personal, sociological, global, political, economic, spiritual, medical, or scientific
              • What implications for you, our nation or the world do these idea’s have?
              • Are these idea’s controversial?
                • To whom and why?
            • Describe the culture talked about in the book.
              • How is the culture described in this book different than where we live?
              • What economic or political situations are described?
              • Does the author examine economics and politics, family traditions, the arts, religious beliefs, language or food?
            • Talk about specific passages that struck you as significant—or interesting, profound, amusing, illuminating, disturbing, sad...?
              • What was memorable?



            New Words:

            • homogamy: inbreeding, especially as a result of isolation.
            • putative: generally considered or reputed to be.

            Book References:

            • Treatise on Cryptography by Andre Lange, S. A. Soudart, E. A. Soudart
            • Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm
            • The American Black Chamber by Herbert O Yardley
            • Cours de Cryptographie by General Marcel Givierge
            • Manuale di Crittografia by General Luigi Sacco
            • Elements of Cryptography by Roger Baudouin
            • Elements of Cyrptanalysis by William F Friedman
            • The Principles of Indirect Symmetry of Position in Secondary Alphabets and their Application in the Solution of Polyalphabetic Substitution Ciphers by William F Friedman
            • The Index of Coincidence and Its Applications in Cryptanalysis by William F Friedman
            • Saga of Myself by Frances Lynd Scott


            Good Quotes:
            • First Line: The planes looked like distant pinpoints at first, and few who saw them took them seriously even up to the moment they dropped their payloads.
            • Last Line: It feels as if an enemy might still be at the window, listening in.
            Table of Contents:
            • The secret letters
            • Introduction: "Your country needs you, young ladies"
            • Part I. "In the event of total war women will be needed"
            • Twenty-eight acres of girls
            • "This is a man's size job, but I seem to be getting away with it"
            • The most difficult problem
            • "So many girls in one place"
            • Part II. "Over all this vast expanse of waters Japan was supreme"
            • "It was heart-rending"
            • "Q for communications"
            • The forlorn shoe
            • "Hell's half-acre"
            • "It was only human to complain"
            • Pencil-pushing mamas sink the shipping of Japan
            • Part III. The tide turns
            • Sugar camp
            • "All my love, Jim"
            • "Enemy landing at the mouth of the Seine"
            • Teedy
            • The surrender message
            • Good-bye to Crow
            • Epilogue: The mitten.

            References: