Monday, January 20, 2020

Encounters with Jesus: Unexpected Answers to Life's Biggest Questions

Book: Encounters with Jesus: Unexpected Answers to Life's Biggest Questions
Basic Information : Synopsis : Expectations : Thoughts : EvaluationNew Words : Book References : Good Quotes : Table of Contents : References

Basic Information:

Author: Timothy Keller
Edition: pdf from bought hardcopy
Publisher: Viking
ISBN: 052595435X (ISBN13: 9780525954354)
Start Date: September 16, 2019
Read Date: January 20, 2020
213 pages
Genre: Christianity
Language Warning: None
Rated Overall: 3 out of 5

Religion: Christianity
Religious Quality: 4 out of 5
Christianity-Teaching Quality: 4 out of 5

Synopsis:
Timothy Keller is writing to those who want a reason to believe that Jesus is the Christ, is God. He has given a series of talks in New York and has transformed them into a series of chapter length essays. He covers Jesus’ interactions in a series of relationships.


Expectations:
  • Recommendation: Sherri
  • When: May 2019
  • How come do I want to read this book: In Fall 2019 our House Church will be using it as part of our study
  • What do I think I will get out of it? Insights into how Jesus interacted with people

Thoughts:
Introduction
Keller talks about why he wrote this book. First it was how he came to learn to love Jesus-by searching for the answers rather being given the answers. But then he was invited to give a series of talks to non-Christian audiences. He thought the best way was to introduce Jesus rather than preach about him.

Keller's notes that in college he was looking for why he was a Christian. In doing so, he joined a Bible study where questions were asked rather than being taught. They came to conclusions together. It was through studying John that Keller started encountering Jesus and his life and power through the text. He started studying not just for intellectual stimulation but in order to find God.

In studying the Bible study it, not gloss over it. Understand it and search deeper into a passage besides the first things which comes to our minds.

In John, Jesus has a tendency to explore the big meaning of life questions.

First five chapters are from talks he gave at Oxford to those who are skeptics. The second five are to the New York Harvard Club.


The Skeptical Student
Talks about what you lose by despising things and when you remove Christianity, you also remove the foundation of Western culture and morals. The third thing Keller says is that Jesus gives us reason to believe.

Thurst of this chapter: Where should we look for answers to the big questions of life? And where
Shouldn’t we look for answers?

Keller takes several thoughts from Luc Ferry as the basis for this chapter.

The Greeks believed that the universe had a rational and moral order to it… called the Logos. I think this Logos while connected to what John starts the gospel as with the Logos, the Greeks would not have said they were connected. Later on Keller says that John deliberately borrowed this term to connect with Greek thinking. Keller quotes John 1:1-3, 14.

This Logos was not a thing, but a person. This seemed ludicrous to the Greeks.

Takes John 1:43-51 where Nathanael is skeptical about Jesus until he actually meets him.

There is a tendency to be bigoted about things, whether from place or ideas. In doing so, there is a sense of discounting what is the object of bigotry.

The idea of each person is made in God’s image is important in understanding each person’s place in society. This comes from John’s teaching on Logos. Keller shows how that in the Bible how God has most effectively dealt with this world is through those of lesser use to the world. He used younger sons, barren women, and those who came from places of no-importance.

The importance of Christianity is not that you had nice people doing nice things, but that you had God changing people so they could be better than they should be. Being nice never made sense to anyone until people came to understand the Christian message about the nature of ultimate reality.

In other words, it is what God does to us is what makes the difference, not what we do for God.

Keller postulates that in today’s environment, people do not think they need something. But when there is the opportunity to fill themselves, they will come to the place which does.

He takes the case of W.H.Auden who left the church. But when WW II broke out, he found was that novelty and shock of the Nazis in the 1940s was they made no pretense of believing in justice and liberty for all-they attacked Christianity on the grounds that to love one’s neighbor as oneself was a command fit only for effeminate weaklings."

Keller pushes the idea that if there is no higher being/principle then how do you just what is ultimately wrong or right? How do you appeal to a higher standard when genocide hits?

Being skeptical is OK in the short-term. But as a long-range position, it is self-defeating. The longer you are skeptical, the more skeptical you become. You stop searching and retreat into your own world of doubt.

And here Jesus makes the incredible claim that he is that way. He is the Logos of the universe, the bridge between Heaven and Earth.


The Insider and the Outcast
The issue here is why does the world need rescuing.

The reason why John put the Samaritan Woman (John 4:7-19) and Nicodemus together is that John wanted us to treat them together, not separately. There are things in common between them.

A big point is that both the religious and the outcast are sinners.

Women-an outcast because of nationality. Also there is a sense of moral issues in her background-coming at noon, five husbands, …. Keller notes Jesus is friendly, but dos not allow her to weasel away from her issues.

Keller says that even when we achieve our physical goals, we do feel satisfied. This indicates that we need something beyond what the physical world offers-a yearning for the spiritual. He gives a quote from Henry David Wallace which the conclusion is that whatever you seek after will not satisfy you will be consumed by it.

The outcome of the conversation with the woman is that he is what she is looking for.

Then John goes to the Nicodemus story. Nicodemus is someone who has achieved and should be satisfied. But Jesus talks to him about what he is lacking.

One thing becomes evident is that Jesus works on us at a deeper level of what sin is. He gets beyond the nice guy a\or do good and looks at who we are. Keller goes beyond and talks about what do you owe God? m(I am not sure he really has established this owing thing.)


The Grieving Sisters
Story of Martha, Mary and Lazarus out of John 11:17-36. Keller’s point is that Mary and Martha gets almost the same statements from the sisters when Jesus arrives too late to heal Lazarus. Jesus responds differently to the two of them. One almost a harsh rebuke, the other soft and tenderly. Story shows that he is not just God faking being a human, but a human and God wrapped up as one.

Throughout the gospels, Jesus makes claims of being at the beginning of creation, forgiving sins, being the resurrection. John Duncan confronted the question of Jesus was a good teacher by countering this with what Jesus taught was either a liar, madman or God. CS Lewis took this as well. My comment to this is as a Christian, I get too used to his claim. Thus taking a moderate thinking and action. a Christian should always be radical. should be more like his master than I am.

Keller finishes off with the stone being opened in John 11:38-44

Keller notes that when he commands the stone to be moved, he is at his angry limits. His take on this is that Jesus was angry at evil, sin and death, not at the family or God.

Our relationship to God is much more like a character in a play to Shakespeare than we have not searched the physical world enough. Keller goes on and says that there is a parallel to Drothy Sayers and Lord Peter Whimsy, her main character. She saw how lonely he was and wrote herself into the story to save him from despair.


The Wedding Party
In this chapter, I want to think about how things can be put right in the world.

Looks at John 2. Emphasis in those days was more in terms of being a good person in whatever place you were in: husband, wife, child, father or mother. Marriage was to establish a place in community. Each wedding was a public feast for the entire town because marriage was about the whole community, not merely the couple. Jesus turning the water into wine was the first of the signs which Jesus did.

Why did Jesus use a celebration to do his first sin? Wasn’t there more important things to be done? Jesus is saying, as it were, I am the true master of the banquet. I am Lord of the Feast. It is a way of saying his coming is a feast of joy.

The Bible often uses sensory language. Psalm 34 says to Taste and see that the Lord is good. Both senses rather than a proclamation.

We must understand that we are stained, that we need to be purified, that we have guilt and shame, and we need to be rescued from it--not conned into believing it doesn’t exist. This is the central point of the book, I think. Keller’s point is that we need to recognize that we do wrong. There is guilt on this. Now what does it take to legitimately remove this guilt? Keller goes on and says: One of the reasons you have all these dreams of working hard to look good and do well and achieve is because you are trying to prove to yourself and everyone else, even people who may not be around anymore, that you are not a bum. Keller thinks that all people, when they live long enough, even those whose philosophy denies the need for guilt, eventually feel guilty about something.

Keller argues that even people like Eichmann are not sub-human, but fully human. Each of us are capable these acts such as concentration camps. Hannah Ardendt says that Eichmann was the banality of evil.

Keller connects the changing of the water into wine as with Jesus’ death. He says in response to Mary that his hour has not come. The word hour in John resonates with his death. The water in the jars are for purification. The wine is what he drinks at the Last Supper. Keller goes on and says this points to that Jesus consistently was thinking about his own death, not going about to be a good example.

Sidney in A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens is brought up a a substitute for correcting a wrong.

The middle part of this chapter is weak, but he really comes on strong with giving us an understanding that Jesus was sipping death at the wedding while everyone else was sipping wine he had created.


The First Christian
Chapter is how Christians should participate in making the world right. He wants to right the confusion about what Christian faith means. John 20:1-18

Christian faith is both impossible and rational. The impossible part is without intervention, faith does not come into play. He says that belief in the person and work of Christ does not come naturally to anyone.

He quotes from The Last Word by Thomas Nagel about how religion is to be feared. Nagel says that I want atheism to be true,... I hope that there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God…[And then Nagel concludes] I am curious, … whether there is anyone who is genuinely indifferent as to whether there is a God.

Is belief in God wish fulfillment. Keller points out that atheism may also be wish fulfillment. CS Lewis points out that a sick man may wish for the rising sun. This is the belief that there will be a rising sun in the morning. Does that mean there is no sun? We all have something invested in the answer to, is there a God? We cannot be objective. You can doubt God’s existence, but by the same standard, you can doubt the doubts as well.

This leads us to the conclusion that without his help, We are not even capable of truly wanting Jesus without his help.

Keller goes on and say that faith is rational. He states that Christianity is much more than being rational; this does not make it less. ...faith is based on evidence, and right before us we have some of the most important evidence the Bible offers us. What Keller does not work through is why trust the Bible.

People of that time did not believe in the resurrection of the body. Greeks and Romans felt that to be pure you needed to be separated from the body. The Jews believed in a last times resurrection, not of an individual human, who lived in their midst. Consequently the disciples were not expecting a resurrection.

Once you have cancer, it will focus you on the meaning of life.

Christian faith does not go down as there is more evidence. Keller says that evidence which engages rationality boosts faith. Faith is not hoping for something to be true, but building on evidence that it is true. You can’t get to real faith without reason.

Christianity rests on it being true, not relevant, or feels good, or exciting, … ...If its not true, in the end it won’t be practical and relevant.

Real faith is always personal.
Why did Jesus chose Mary, a woman, not one of the leadership? An outcast?

Faith is both the cause and content of grace.

No two people come to faith the same way.

Annie Dillard: I’d been my whole life a bell, but never knew it until I was lifted up and rung.


The Great Enemy
Keller talks about how to encounter Jesus today. This is the theme of the final five chapters. In this chapter he talks about overcoming evil.

Jesus was baptized and then tempted. Why are they related? These two events are connected with the word then. Keller notes that After great blessings and success came trial and temptation.

Keller, like CS Lewis in The Screwtape Letters, uses the word undulations to describe the Christian life. There are high and low points. We cannot live a perfectly consistent life. So our life will be a serious of getting things right and trying to work out of a hole which are faults lead us into. But Lewis points out that even with that, these undulations is part of God’s plan to make us ready for the kingdom.

Jesus was tempted and suffered hardship. If he did then we will. But a thoroughly human example is Job who lived an exemplary life. He lost everything and still maintained his desire for God.

As a note: when we see someone struggling, it may not be that they are the cause.

Keller says that the Bible can can explain the nuanced, multidimensional and complexity of evil more than science. I am wondering, does science evaluate evil? Wouldn’t that be outside of its sphere?

We as 21st century American’s misjudge and underestimate the power of evil, particularly in our lives.

Morality does not lead to prosperity. Examples: Jesus and Job.

Keller says there are three things when facing up to evil:
  • Who is the enemy?
    • This is dependent on you world view. If you think of dualism, then you cannot decide which is the enemy since they are both equal. Also there is no sign of defeating that which humans consider evil.
    • There is is monism where all is one thing. Both evil and good.
    • Keller says that modern culture seems to borrow from both of these views. The outcome is that we apply behavioral reasoning to what would be considered evil outcomes. It is because of the person’s upbringing, so that person is not at fault. But When we find someone truly monstrous, we are at a loss for an explanation.
    • Christianity is neither of the above. We have an evil entity called the devil. But his evil is not equal to God’s goodness. He is neither perfectly evil nor of equal power to God.
      • Christianity says there’s more evil than you can account for in the world just from the cumulative effect of wrong individual choices. And you can attribute some of that evil to actual demonic forces.
  • Where is the front?
    • Doubt
  • What is our best defense?
    • To know truth

The Two Advocates
Jesus intercedes for us.

Keller says that for three years, Jesus taught the disciples that he was to die for their sins (and all humans). But that lesson was not understood.

Jesus was send an advocate for us-the Holy Spirit. This is a person, not a life-force. Also called comforter, Helper, or Counselor.

The other advocate is Jesus himself.

I'd argue that unless you know that Jesus was the first Advocate, you won't understand the work of the Holy Spirit as the second Advocate at all

Keller notes that each of us have a sense of right and wrongness-even if it is different from anybody else's. When we feel we are not treated fairly, we will argue from our standard of fairness, not somebody else's. what's natural can be wrong only if there is a "super-natural" standard by which you could judge it.

Keller’s point is that Jesus is more than a supporter of us or a good moral teacher. He is there to advocate for us. In court, what the judge sees is your lawyer and what the lawyer has to say. you're lost in your advocate you are in your advocate. It is Jesus pleading your case. It is not just Jesus saying be lenient on this person, but that Jesus’ client is guilty but that Jesus has paid the price of his guilt already.

You want to make a case that is not based on how the court feels at the time but is open and shut according to the law.

The first Advocate is speaking to God for you, but the second Advocate is speaking to you for you.

Sometimes a person thinks that by living in Jesus’ time on earth, we would know Jesus better. But from the record of the disciples, that is not the case. Why? Keller says that it is the Holy Spirit who is showing us who Jesus is.

right here and now, through the Holy Spirit, you can see Christ and know his presence and his love better than the apostles could in that moment in the upper room. If you're a Christian, it's likely that you're not living as if this is true. Convicting


The Obedient Master
Jesus obeyed God perfectly for us.

Keller indicates this is not time between events, the time on the Mt of Olives is a time where we see Jesus his wanting to be closest with His Father and yet seeming the farthest, look at him in prayer, not at the disciples who were not ready for the trauma of the night.

The agony of this time was one which he thought he would die. This did not start when he reached his knees, but even as he was walking with his disciples.

Speaking of Stephen’s death: They [Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp] argued that Christians suffered and died better than pagans. But Jesus here is not facing death with a bright and beautiful face, but one of agony. this was a different death than anybody else ever faced before or since.

The essence of sin is "I do not want to have God in my life."
he was walking into the garden, he would have started to pray, and suddenly-for the first time in all of eternity-he would find the lines of communication severed. I wonder if this meant that at this point there was no backing out for Jesus. There was no calling down armies of angels, but he was left abandoned?

Keller talks about Jesus’ active (healing, teaching, …) and is passive(death on the cross) work.


The Right Hand of the Father
Jesus left earth so that he could reign over all for us.
  1. Puzzling to the disciples who witnessed it.
  2. Puzzling to us
What difference to us that Jesus ascended?

What is an ascension? Not just returning to heaven. More of a seating on the throne, like a coronation. Not just a change of elevation. But the rightful monarch taking his place.

This is where Jesus shows both his divinity and humanity. He takes His place as God but in the form of a man. The ascension releases Jesus from the physical constraints of being human, particularly being in a certain time and in a certain place. Consequently he can minister and be with us everywhere. We do not need to worship at a certain spot.

This means practically three things:
  1. Jesus is available to us
    1. You ascended from before our eyes and we turned back grieving, only to find you in our hearts. St Augustine(Unverified)
  2. Jesus controls all things
  3. Jesus intercede for us
    1. Jesus is making everything work together for your good means that not only are bad things part of his plan but also little things.
  4. You are forgiven

The Courage of Mary
Jesus left heaven to die for us.

Keller is looking at Mary because Mary is like us in her response to Jesus.

Keller points out that the name of Jesus is literally God saves us. Not that God sent a guide. Differentiates Jesus from other messengers.

To the Hebrews, God was not an impersonal force that is part of all being but a unique, personal yet infinite, immanent yet transcendent, eternal Creator who existed before and above all other beings

Those who say that all religions are alike do not show enough respect to listen to the distinctive voice each religion brings to this world. Among young secular adults it is common to adopt this belief that all religions are roughly the same.

wonder=deologistico,=to use logic, to reason with intensity

This news certainly did not fit in with what Mary knew-because the message meant a human being would be divine. The idea that the God of Mount Sinai would become human was impossible to the reason and repugnant to the moral sensibility of the Jews

Mary gave voice to her doubts

when you ask a real question, it makes you somewhat vulnerable.

When confronted with Christ, the hardest thing to do is to give in. You can't know the cost of following Jesus ahead of time. Mary’s cost is that she is either a heritic or had unlawful sex-either way is punishable by death.

Mary breaks into worship when confronted by Elizabeth. The other thing which drives Mary is the need for community.


Evaluation:
Timothy Keller’s objective is to write an understandable, compelling narrative about who Jesus is. He goes through the life of Jesus talking about various incidents which highlight aspects of Jesus’ life on earth as well as his ascension into heaven. Keller writes in a clear and understandable manner. So if one is interested in a good overview of Jesus, this one will not lead you astray. 


New Words:
  • Primogeniture (chp 1): the right of succession belonging to the firstborn child, especially the feudal rule by which the whole real estate of an intestate passed to the eldest son.
  • Trilemma (chp 3): a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between three alternatives, especially when these are equally undesirable.
Book References:
  • Conversations with Jesus Christ from the Gospel of John by Marilyn Kunz and Catherine Schell
  • A History of Philosophy by Luc Ferry
  • The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism by Tim Keller
  • For Better by Tara Parker-Pope,
  • After Virtue by Alasdaiir MacIntyre
  • Christian Reflections by CS Lewis (The essay “The Seeing Eye” is references)
  • Three Gospels by Reynolds Price
  • Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien
  • The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky's
  • Iliad by Homer
  • A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens
  • The Last Word by Thomas Nagel
  • The Resurrection of the Son of God by NT Wright
  • The Death of Satan: How Americans Have Lost the Sense of Evil by Andrew Delbanco
  • The City of God by Augustine
  • Mere Christianity by CS Lewis
  • Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris
  • Death of a Salesman.by Arthur Miller
  • The Great Divorce by CS Lewis
  • Christ's Agony by Jonathan Edwards
  • Systematic Theology by Louis Berkhof

Good Quotes:
  • First Line: I was raised in a mainline Protestant church, but in college I went through personal and spiritual crises that led me to question my most fundamental beliefs about God, the world, and myself.
  • Last Line: You can, too.
  • Real faith is always personal. Chp The First Christian
  • I’d been my whole life a bell, but never knew it until I was lifted up and rung., Annie Dillard, Pilgrim at Tinker Creek
  • When you ask a real question, it makes you somewhat vulnerable. Chp 10
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • The Skeptical Student
  • The Insider and the Outcast
  • The Grieving Sisters
  • The Wedding Party
  • The First Christian
  • The Great Enemy
  • The Two Advocates
  • The Obedient Master
  • The Right Hand of the Father
  • The Courage of Mary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
References:

No comments: