Friday, July 18, 2014

American Slavery As It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses

Book: American Slavery As It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses
Author:  Weld, Theodore Dwight; Angelina Grimke and Sarah Grimke
Edition: eBook from the web site Documenting the American South
Read: July 2014

261 pages
Rated: 4 out of 5

Synopsis:
Written in 1839, it predates the Civil War by 20+ years. It lays out how slavery works, with its brutality. It was a tool to remove many of the Northern myths about the gentleness of Southern slavery. This was done through eye witness accounts, excerpting legal documents, newspaper articles, and advertisements.

Thoughts:

The first thing which struck me about this book was how pedantic it is. There is nothing fancy with it. Weld and the Grimke sisters collected accounts from eye-witnesses, newspapers and legal proceedings. Then categorized them. So the results does not lend me to a natural interest.

But the result is a real eye opener.  As individual testimonies you can argue that this was an isolated incident. But when you look at the large number of accounts, spread over 20 years throughout the South-even the more northern South, the picture painted is one of depravity. Not only to the pain and suffering inflicted on the slaves but to the resulting loss of humanity to the citizens of the South.

Weld starts the book with a series of testimonials about the fierce and brutal treatment of the slaves. He starts with the whippings endured for the smallest infractions, being tied to a post or hung over a beam to be stretched while whipped. These were the mild treatments. He describes how one lady invented a torment where a person would be forced to stand on one leg-the other tied to her and a noose around her head for over an hour. There is more, lots more, but you get the idea.

Then there were the work houses which today would be more described as torture chambers. These would be places where a slave-owner could take a slave to and have them disciplined. In most cases the disciplining would include the torments above, but more severe.

The work hours would be from before sunrise to well after sunset. A slave would need to eat before going to the fields. They may be able to have a break or two in the fields before coming back to their hut. Any clothes or repairs or firewood which was needed got to be done during their "off" hours. This included sleeping. A slave owner would do a calculation on how much work vs feed vs time in the field could they get out of the slave before they would die. As long as he got his money's worth out of the slave, he was OK with slaves dying, even as much turn over as having to get a new slave every three or four years.

Slave families were not a consideration, only what money could a slave holder get for the slave. Consequently, children were orphaned regularly when a mother or father was sold. Pregnant women would be worked until almost they gave birth. A new mother would be given two weeks off before returning to the fields, with their new babies being layened by the side of the field. No special account was given to their needs.

Weld addressed the concerns that these were isolated cases or actions only committed by lower class people. But he showed how judges, mayors, governors and congressmen all took part. Religion or gender did not lessen the ferocity of the brutality. Nor did location-brutality was the norm even in the northern part of the South.

The legal system did not protect the slaves as the slaves had no rights.  Our dog has more protection against abuse and death than the slaves had. 

Blacks in the North were not safe either. Repeated stories of being snatched from a Northern town only to be a slave in the South were relayed. Even those who had papers and were free-born were not safe.  Justice in the South for a black was non-existent, so a black had no right to appeal to the law. Even when prominent Northerners vouched for the black, the black was not let go.

One of the more damning sections happens at the last. Weld talks about the effect of slavery on the slave holders. He shows that the amount of lawlessness in the South is highly out of proportion to what it is in comparative Northern states. But it is not only the amount, but the corruptness of the law in the South has suffered. While he does not say outright, but the inference is there, slavery degrades the owners as well as the slaves. It brings down the culture to own another person.

So is this book only an interesting piece of history? To me there was several take aways from it:
  • The book brought into sharp focus that slavery in America was not just a matter of not paying someone and denying their freedom. But it was cruel and barbaric, probably something along the scope of the Nazi's in Germany. The only thing was the Nazi's were organized while the South did not have that theme of common focus.
  • The question would be is slavery ever humane? I cannot answer that. In the Bible, the Jews had a system where slavery was not perpetual, and had limits, sort of like an indentured serverant. But I do not think the Jews ever put it into practice.
  • Is there systems in place today which are similar? I do not know of anything in America, except for an occasional sweat house. But there is slavery still practiced around the world.
  • Last, and maybe more personal, anytime which we wrong another, we also degrade ourselves. This is a biblical theme. It just is not really talked about. This may be the main effect of liberalism today. Not that I think that capitalism with its disregard for morals in its rush for money does better. We are consumed with wrong-doing. We will be reaping the effect of that soon.

Evaluation: 

A word of explanation on why I gave this a four stars. It is not a well written book. It is hard reading and very dated. But it is a book which causes one to sharpen their image of the American past, particularly pre-Civil War. It also makes one understand a bit more of some parts of the South today. This book was written in 1839 as an anti-slavery tact, 13 years before Uncle Tom's Cabin was published. It is said it was the most influential abolitionist book behind Uncle Tom's Cabin.

I found this book through a note from Susan Monk Kidd in her book The Invention of Wings. In Kidd's book she noted that the Angelina and Sarah Grimke were from her home town and she did not know about it. From there, she found an American Anti-Slavery Society tract called American Slavery: As It Is.  Having previously read Fredrick Douglas' autobiography earlier, I was wondering how this book matched up and how Kidd's book matched with American Slavery. If anything, Douglas' book is rather tame compared to Weld's account.

This is not light reading. As one person said, she could not rate the book because it is not entertainment reading. She is right, it was an indictment in 1839 about the whole slavery system. As such, it is 250+ pages of painful reading of one atrocity after another done to Negros both slaves and free.


I will say I had a tendency to skip some paragraphs as there is a lot of repetition of similar acts of torture. But this book was written to document how slavery had inflicted evil on the South. Not only on negros, but on white. The writings show that the people of the South considered the negros as sub-human. They would inflict punishments on them that not even their animals would have been subject to. Not only are the negros degraded, but so is the whole culture. This book indirectly shows how the whites resorted to a leve of brutality which we more associate with barbarians than the refined culture of the South.

As a book, it is repetitive. It relies on people's accounts rather than the authors narrative to get their points across. As a propaganda tool, an instructional instrument, it opened my eyes to how truly barbaric the treatment of slaves in the South was. This is a must read for anybody who wants to understand the nature of slavery. Warning, this is a very graphic book, even for our times.



Book References:
  • Picture of slavery in the United States, George Bourne

Good Quotes:
  • First Line: READER, you are empannelled as a juror to try a plain case and bring in an honest verdict.  
  • Last Line:  If, when in passion, they seize those who are on their own level, and dash them under their feet, with what a crushing vengeance will they leap upon those who are always under their feet? 
Table of Contents:
INTRODUCTION.--7-10.
Twenty-seven hundred thousand free born citizens of the U. S. in slavery,
7: Tender mercies of slaveholders, 8: Abominations of slavery, 9: Character of the testimony, 9-10.
PERSONAL NARRATIVES--PART I. pp. 10-27.
NARRATIVE OF NEHEMIAH CAULKINS,
102; North Carolina slavery, 11; Methodist preaching slavedriver, Galloway, 12: Women at child-birth, 12: Slaves at labor, 12: Clothing of slaves, 13; Allowance of provisions, 13; Slave-fetters, 13; Cruelties to slaves, 13, 14, 15, Burying a slave alive, 15; Licentiousness of Slaveholders, 15, 16; Rev. Thomas P. Hunt, with his "hands tied," 16; Preachers cringe to slavery, 15; Nakedness of slaves, 16; Slave-huts, 16; Means of subsistence for slaves, 16, 17; Slaves' prayer, 17.
NARRATIVE OF REV. HORACE MOULTON,
17; Labor of the slaves, 18; Tasks, 18; Whipping posts, 18; Food, 18 Houses, 19; Clothing, 19; Punishments, 19, 20; Scenes of horror, 20; Constables, savage and brutal, 20; Patrols, 20; Cruelties at night, 20, 21; Paddle-torturing, 20; Cat-hauling, 21; Branding with hot iron, 21; Murder with impunity, 21; Iron collars, yokes, clogs, and bells, 21.
NARRATIVE OF SARAH M. GRIMKE, 22; Barbarous Treatment of slaves, 22; Converted slave, 22; Professor of religion, near death, tortured his slave for visiting his companion, 33; Counterpart of James Williams' description of Larrimore's wife, 23; Head of runaway slave on a pole, 23; Governor of North Carolina left his sick slave to perish, 23; Cruelty to Women slaves, 34; Christian slave a martyr for Jesus, 24.
TESTIMONY OF REV. JOHN GRAHAM,
25; Twenty-seven slaves whipped, 26.
TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM POE,
26; Harris whipped a girl to death, 26; Captain of the U. S. Navy murdered his boy, was tried and acquitted, 26; Overseer burnt a slave, 26; Cruelties to slaves, 26.
PRIVATIONS OF THE SLAVES, pp. 27--44.
FOOD,
28-31; Suffering from hunger, 28; Rations in the U. S. Army, &c, 32; Prison rations, 33-34; Testimony, 34, 35. LABOR, 35; Slaves are overworked, 35; Witnesses, 35, 36; Henry Clay, 37; Child-bearing prevented, 37; Dr. Channing, 38; Sacrifice of a set of hands every seven years, 38; Testimony, 39: Laws of Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, South Carolina, and Virginia, 39. CLOTHING, 40; Witnesses, 40, 41; Advertisements, 41; Testimony, 41; Field-hands, 41; Nudity of slaves, 42; John Randolph's legacy to Essex and Hetty, 42. DWELLINGS, 42; Witnesses, 43; Slaves are wretchedly sheltered and lodged, 43. TREATMENT OF THE SICK, 44.
PERSONAL NARRATIVES, PART II. pp 45-57.
TESTIMONY OF THE REV. WILLIAM T. ALLAN.
45; Woman delivered of a dead chiid, being whipped, 46; Slaves shot by Hilton, 46; Cruelties to slaves, 46; Whipping post, 46; Assaults, and maimings, 46, 47; Murders, 47; Puryear, "the Devil," 47; Overseers always armed, 44; Licentiousness of Overseers, 47; "Bend your backs," 47; Mrs. H., a Presbyterian, desirous to cut Arthur Tappan's throat, 47; Clothing, Huts, and Herding of slaves, 47; Iron yokes with prongs, 47; Marriage unknown among slaves, 46; Presbyterian minister at Huntsville, 47; Concubinage in Preacher's house, 47; Slavery, the great wrong, 47.
NARRATIVE OF WILLIAM LEFTWICH,
48, 49; Slave's life, 48, 49.
TESTIMONY OF LEMUEL SAPINGTON,
49; Nakedness of slaves, 49; Traffic in slaves, 49.
TESTIMONY OF MRS. LOWRY,
50; Long, a professor of religion killed three men, 50; Salt water applied to wounds to keep them from putrefaction, 50.
TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM C. GILDERSLEEVE,
50; Acts of cruelty, 50.
TESTIMONY OF HIRAM WHITE,
51; Woman with a child chained to her neck, 51; Amalgamation, and mulatto children, 51.
TESTIMONY OF JOHN M. NELSON,
51; Rev. Conrad Speece influenced Alexander Nelson when dying not to emancipate his slaves, 52; George Bourne opposed slavery in 1810, 52.
TESTIMONY OF ANGELINA GRIMKE WELD,
52; House-servants, 52; Slave-driving female professors of religion at Charleston, S. C., 53; Whipping women and prayer in the same room, 53; Tread-mills, 53; Slaveholding religion, 54; Slave-driving mistress prayed for the divine blessing upon her whipping of an aged woman, 54; Girl killed with impunity, 54; Jewish law, 54; Barbarities, 54; Medical attendance upon slaves, 55; Young man beaten to epilepsy and insanity, 55; Mistresses flog their slaves, 55; Blood-bought luxuries, 55; Borrowing of slaves, 55; Meals of slaves, 55; All comfort of slaves disregarded, 56; Severance of companion lovers, 56; Separation of parents and children, 56; Slave espionage, 57; Sufferings of slaves, 57; Horrors of slavery indescribable, 56.
TESTIMONY OF CRUELTY INFLICTED UPON SLAVES,
57; Colonization Society, 60; Emancipation Society of North Carolina, 60; Kentucky, 61.
PUNISHMENTS,
62-72; Floggings, 62; Witnesses and Testimony, 62, 63.
SLAVE DRIVING,
69; Droves of slaves, 70.
CRUELTY TO SLAVES,
70; Slaves like Stock without a shelter, 71; "Six pound paddle," 71.
TORTURES OF SLAVES. Iron collars, chains, fetters, and hand-cuffs,
72-76: Advertisements for fugitive slaves, 73: Testimony, 74, 75: Iron head-frame, 76: Chain coffles, 76; Droves of 'human cattle,' 76: Washington, the National slave market, 76: Testimony of James K. Paulding, Secretary of the Navy; Literary fraud and pretended prophecy by Mr. Paulding, 77. Brandings, Maimings, and Gun-shot wounds, 77: Witnesses and Testimony, 77-82: Mr. Sevier, senator of the U. S. 79: Judge Hitchcock, of Mobile, 79: Commendable fidelity to truth in the advertisements of slaveholders, 82: Thomas Aylethorpe cut off a slave's ear, and sent it to Lewis Tappan, 93: Advertisemants for runaway slaves with their teeth mutilated, 83, 84; Excessive cruelty to slaves, 85: Slaves burned alive, 86: Mr. Turner, a slave-butcher, 87: Slaves roasted and flogged, 87: Cruelties common, 88: Fugitive slaves, 88: Slaves forced to eat tobacco worms, 88: Baptist Christians escaping from slavery, 88; Christian whipped for praying, 88: James K. Paulding's testimony, 89: Slave driven to death, 89: Coroner's inquest on Harney's murdered female slave, 89: Man-stealing encouraged by law, 90: Trial for a murdered slave, 90: Female slave whipped to death, and during the torture delivered of a dead infant, 90: Slaves murdered, 90, 91, 92: Slave driven to death, 92: Slaves killed with impunity, 93: George, a slave, chopped piece-meal, and burnt by Lilburn Lewis, 92; Retributive justice in the awful death of Lilburn Lewis, 94: Trial of Isham Lewis, a slave murderer, 94.
PERSONAL NARRATIVES.--PART III. PAGE 94-109.
NARRATIVE OF REV. FRANCIS HAWLEY,
94; Plantations, 94; Overscers, 95; No appeal from Overseers to Masters, 95.
CLOTHING,
95; Nudity of slaves  WORK, 95; Cotton-picking, 96; Mothers of slaves, 96; Presbyterian minister killed his slave, 96; Methodist colored preacher hung, 96; Licentiousness, 97; Slave-traffic, 97; Night in a Slaveholder's house, 97; Twelve slaves murdered, 97; Slave driving Baptist preachers, 97; Hunting of runaways slaves, 97; Amalgamation, 97. TESTIMONY OF REUBEN C. MACY, AND RICHARD MACY, 98. Whipping of slaves, 98, 99. Testimony of Eleazer Powel, 99; Overseer of Hinds Stuart, shot a slave for opposing the torture of his female companion, 100. TESTIMONY OF REV. WILLIAM SCALES, 100. Three slaves murdered with impunity, 100; Separation of lovers, parents, and children, 101.
TESTIMONY OF JOS. IDE, 101. Mrs. T. a Presbyterian kind woman-killer, 101; Female slave whipped to death, 101; Food, 101; Nakedness of slaves, 101; Old man flogged after praying for his tyrant, 101; Slave-huts not as comfortable as pig-sties, 101.
TESTIMONY OF REV. PHINEAS SMITH,
101. Texas, 102; Suit for the value of slave 'property,' 102; Anson Jones, Ambassador from Texas, 102; No trial or punishment for the murder of slaves, 102; Slave-hunting in Texas, 102; Suffering drives the slaves to despair and suicide, 102.
TESTIMONY OF PHIL'N BLISS, 102. Ignorance of northern citizens respecting slavery, 102, Betting upon crops, 103; Extent and cruelty of the punishment of slaves, 103; Slaveholders excuse their cruelties by the example of Preachers, and professors of religion, and Northern citizens, 104; Novel torture, eulogized by a professor of religion, 104; Whips as common as the plough, 104; Ladies use cowhides, with shovel and tongs, 104. TESTIMONY OF REV. WM. A. CHAPIN, 105. Slave-labor, 105; Starvation of slaves, 105; Slaves lacerated, without clothing, and without food, 105.
TESTIMONY OF T. M. MACY, 105. Cotton plantations on St. Simon's Island, 105; Cultivntion of rice, 106; No time for relaxation, 106; Sabbath a nominal rest, 106; Clothing, 106; Flogging, 106.
TESTIMONY OF F. C. MACY,
106. Slave cabins, 106; Food, 106; Whipping every day, 106; Treatment of slaves as brutes, 106; Slave-boys fight for slaveholder's amusement 107; Amalgamation common, 107.
TESTIMONY OF A CLERGYMAN, 107. Natchez, 107; 'Lie down," for whipping, 107; Slave-hunting, 108, 'Ball and chain' men, 108; Whipping at the same time, on three plantations, 108; Hours of Labor, 108; Christians slave- hunting, 108; Many runaway slaves annually shot, 108; Slaves in the stocks, 108; Slave-branding, 108. CONDITION OF SLAVES, 108. Slavery is unmixed cruelty, 108; Fear the only motive of slaves, 109; Pain is the means, not the end of slave-driving, 109; Characters of Slave drivers and Overseers, brutal, sensual, and violent, 109; Ownership of human beings utterly destroys their comfort, 109.
OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED:--PAGE 120--210.
I. Such cruelties are incredible,
110. Slaves deemed to be working animals, or merchandize; and called 'Stock,' 'Increase,' 'Breeders,' 'Drivers,' 'Property,' 'Human cattle,' 110; Testimony of Thomas Jefferson, 110; Slaves worse treated than quadrupeds, 111, 112; Contrast between the usage of slaves and animals, 112; Testimony, 112; Northern incredulity discreditable to consistency, 112; Religious persecutions, 113; Recent 'Lynchings,' and Riots, in the United States, 113; Many outrageous Felonies perpetrated with impunity, 113; Large faith of the objectors who 'can't believe,' 114; 'Doe faces,' and 'Dough faces,' 114; Slave-drivers acknowledge their own enormities, 114; Slave plantations in Alabama. Louisiana, and Mississippi, second only to hell,' 114; Legislature of North Carolina, 115; Incredulity discreditable to intelligence, 115; Abuse of power in the state, and churches, 115; Legal restraints, 116; American slaveholders possess absolute power, 116; Slaves deprived of the safeguards of law, 116; Mutual aversion between the oppressor and the slave, 116; Cruelty the product of arbitrary power, 117; Testimony of Thomas Jefferson, 117; Judge Tucker, 117; Presbyterian Synod of South Carolina, and Georgia, 117; General William H. Harrison, 117; President Edwards, 118; Montesquieu, 118; Wilber force, 118; Whitbread, 118; Characters, 118, 121.
OBJECTION II.--"Slaveholders protest that they treat their slaves well."
121 Not testimony but opinion, 122; 'Good treatment' of slaves,' 123; Novel form of cruelty, 125.
OBJECTION III.--"Slaveholders are proverbial for their kindness, and generosity,
125; Hospitality and benevolence contrasted, 125, 126; Slaveholders in Congress, respecting Texas and Hayti, 126; 'Fictitious kindness and hospitality,' 128.
OBJECTION IV.--"Northern visitors at the south testify that the slaves are not cruelly treated,"
128. Testimony, 128, 129; 'Gubner poisened,' 129; Field-hands, 130; Parlor slaves, 130; Chief Justice Durell, 131.
OBJECTION V.--"It is for the interest of the masters to treat their slaves well,"
132; Testimony, 133. Rev. J. N Maffitt, 134; Masters interest to treat cruelly the great body of the slaves, 134, 138; Various classes of slaves, 135, 136; Hired slaves, 136; Advertisements, 136, 137.
OBJECTION VI:--"Slaves multiply; a proof that they are not inhumanly treated, and are in a comfortable condition,
139. Testimony, 139; Martin VanBuren, 139; Foreign slave trade, 139; 'Beware of Kidnappers,' 140; 'Citizens sold as slaves,' 141; Kidnapping at New Orleans, 141; Slave breeders, 142.
OBJECTION VII.--"Public opinion is a protection to the slave,
143” Decision of the Supreme Court of North and South Carolina, 143; 'Protection of slaves,' 143; Mischievous effects of 'public opinion' concerning slavery, 144; Laws of different states, 144; Heart of slaveholders, 145; Reasons for enacting the laws concerning cruelties to slaves, 147; 'Moderate correction,' 148; Hypocrisy and malignity of slave laws, 148; Testimony of slaves excluded, 149; Capital crimes for slaves, 149; 'Slaveholding brutality,' worse than that of Caligula, 149; Public opinion destroys fundamental rights, 150; Character of slaveholders' advertisements, 152; Public opinion is diabolical, 152, 154; Brutal indecency, 154; Murder of slaves by law, 155, 156; Judge Lawless, 157; Slave-hunting, 159, 160; Health of slaves, 161; Acclimation of slaves, 162; Liberty of Slaves 162; Kidnapping of free citizens, 162; Law of Louisiana, 163; FRIENDS', memorial, 164; Domestic slavery, 164; Advertisements, 164, 167; Childhood, old age, 167; Inhumanity, 169; Butchering dead slaves, 169; South Carolina Medical college, 169; Charleston Medical Infirmary, 172; Advertisements, 172, 173; Slave murders, 173; John Randolph, 173; Charleston slave auctions, 174; 'Never lose a day's work,' 174; Stocks, 175; Slave-breeding, 175; Lynch law, 175; Slaves murdered, 176; Slavery among Christians, 176, 180; Licentiousness encouraged by preachers, 180; 'Fine old preacher who dealt in slaves,' 180; Cruelty to slaves by professors of religion, 181; Slave-breeding, 182; Daniel O'Connel, and Andrew Stevenson, 182; Virginia a negro raising menagerie, 182 Legislature of Virginia, 182; Colonization Society, 183; Inter-state slave traffic, 184; Battles in Congress, 184; Duelling, 185; Cock-fighting, 186; Horse-racing, 186; Ignorance of slaveholders, 187; 'Slave-holding civiltzation, and morality,' 188; Arkansas, 188; Slave driving ruffians, 189, 190; Missouri, 191; Alabama, 192; Butcheries in Mississippi, 194; Louisiana, 198; Tennessee, 200; Fatal Affray in Columbia, 201; Presentment of the Grand Jury of Shelby County, 202; Testimony of Bishop Smith of Kentucky, 204, 206.
ATLANTIC SLAVEHOLDING REGION, 206. Georgia, 206; North Carolina, 209; Trading with Negroes, 209; Conclusion, 210.

References:
    • Wikipedia-Author
    • Wikipedia-Book
    • GoodReads-Book
    • Documenting the American South
    •  PBS America Experience video
    •  Steve Wilkins and Douglas Wilson's monograph entitled Southern Slavery As It Was 
      • The monograph argues that slavery was not done right in the South and tries to defend the institution of slavery from a Biblical point of view.
      • Lew Wallace in Ben Hur depicts a type of Jewish slavery which was different than Weld's. It shows Ben Hur as a benevolent master whose servants love him and his family. Could this ever be a reality?
    •  Reprint of slaves dancing

      Thursday, July 10, 2014

      One Summer: America 1927

      Book: One Summer: America 1927
      Author:Bill Bryson
      Edition:eReader on Nook
      Read:  July 2014
      506 pages
      Rated: 3 out of 5

      Synopsis:
      Bryson takes us through events which happened during the Summer of 1927, including Lindbergh's trans-Atlantic flight, Babe Ruth's 61 homer runs, Calvin Coolidge's actions or non-actions, and various murders and bombings.


      Thoughts:
      Throughout this book, I was mesmerized by Bryson's storytelling. Each individual story was entertaining. But I kept coming back to the question of, so what? Why are these stories being told? Is Bryson weaving a tell out of all these stories? I came to conclusion that there was not any overt attempt at continuity.

      But even with the discontinuity I experienced, there are some things which we can learn. First, was this a turning point in American dominance? It is not so much from any mighty action we did as a nation, but a collective feeling. Such as Lindbergh flying heroically over the Atlantic, Babe Ruth's home runs, the great financiers of Europe coming to America to discuss strategies. Even Calvin Coolidge being able to just let the nation run unattended for four plus years, these showed us that the nation could be strong and take its place among the nations.

      The closest which Bryson makes to a conclusion is With American speech came American thoughts, American attitudes, American humor and sensibilities. Peacefully, by accident, and almost unnoticed, America had just taken over the world. (345) This is not a unique conclusion. Also I do not think Bryson has built the support for this as a conclusion. He certainly has given enough examples of American action during that time. But he does not build on these examples to show how he reached this conclusion beyond making this flat statement.


      But for every bright picture Bryson paints there is also a dark one. Lindbergh being influenced by the eugenics movement with its sister in politics, the Nazi's. Babe Ruth's lack of morals and his alcoholism. The financiers meeting leading to the Great Depression with Calvin Coolidge not having either the foresight or the will to try to change course. With our optimism, we hide the blackness of the evil around us.

      This thought was not so much had to do with the book, but a throw-away comment Bryson made. He talked about the problems of syncing film with sound. A man by the name of Lee DeForest solved the problem by imprinting the sound directly on the film The comment Bryson makes is he would have died a much wealthier man if he had been more focused on making his inventions marketable (340).  Bryson's comment caused the thought to pop into my mind, but what would DeForest spend the money on when he was dead? And then to the coorallary conclusion, we will all die, so why spend so much time chasing money and wealth instead of pursuing those things which have longer reaches into the future?




      Evaluation:
      The big question I have is, why did Bryson write this book? What I found was the outlook of how to read this book. How you like this book will be dependent on how you like to walk. When you go out for a walk, do you feel satisfied by going so far arriving at a specified destination in the expected amount of time? Or do you like to doodle, wander about a bit, look at that cute little blue flower as if you have never seen it before? Enjoy the children playing in the park? And say my, what a mighty fine day we are having? If you are the later person, then you may enjoy One Summer as Bryson leads us on a trip through the Summer of 1927 by a pretty circuitous route. Such as with Lindbergh's flight across the ocean he takes us through a couple of murders in New York, how tabloids started, the politic of 1927,  and the wet weather of 1927, while not saying very much about the actual flight of Lindbergh.

      But that still gets back to why did he write this book? Was it to retell stories of that Summer? I think partly yes. Was it to reveal something about that Summer? If it is, I confess, I did not see the revelation clearly. Was it to tell something about us, about Americans? If so, it got lost in the static. In the end, I was left with the stories and their supporting stories. Maybe I am trying to over-think this book. To me, it was sort of like the automaton in Brian Selznick's The Invention of Hugo Cabret. The automaton started drawing scratch marks which eventually became a picture. But with Bryson's book, I see the scratch marks, but not the picture,

      When you read Bryson, you quickly realize he is more interested in telling a story and telling it well, than in an linear telling of the story. So sit down in a comfortable place, put your legs up and read the book to enjoy a good set of stories, but do not expect too much else.
       
      Notes from my book group:

      My Questions:

      1. Why did you think this would be a good book for us to read?
      2. Have you all read anything else by Bryson-we read A Walk in the Woods as a book group several years ago. How does this book compare to other books which he wrote?
      3. What did you like about the book? What annoyed you?
      4. Was there cohesion in this books presentation? If so, what was it? How does Bryson support that conclusion?
      5.  Did the way Bryson grouped stories together work for you?
      6. Which of Bryson's stories-major or minor-engaged you the most? Which ones did you think were superfluous? 
      7. What heros attracked you? Repealed you? 
      8. One of the things Bryson does in the book is to build up a hero, only to show the hero's flaws. Why does he do that? What is Bryson trying to say?
      9. Why do you think Bryson chose 1927? Why do you think he wrote this book?
      10. Did you learn  about 1927? About American history?
      11. I had a hard time trying to figure out if Bryson was saying anything significant about 1927 or American. What is your take?
      12.  What year would you have chosen? Why?


      LitLovers Reading Guide:
      1. Of all the stories that Bryson tells in One Summer, which one do you find most interesting—which  engaged you more than others? Which story most surprised you (e.g., President Coldidge's four-hour work day)?

      2. Of all the heroes covered in the book, whom do you have the most sympathy for? Maybe Philo Farnsworth?  Which hero do you most admire?  Most despise?

      3. How did Ruth Snyder and Judd Gray bungle the coverup of their murder?

      4. What about Robert Elliott, America's top executioner—how would you describe him? What in his background shaped him to do his job? Would you want him as a father...or husband?

      5. Bryson's trademark humor is on display in One Summer. What parts, in particular, did you find funny?

      6. How much, if anything, have your learned from One Summer? If you've read Bryson's previous A Brief History of Nearly Everything, how does this book compare?

      7. Is there anything about the episodes in this book that mark them as distinctly American? Is there something that links them together in a way that defines the culture of this country?

      8. The book has been criticized as "light"—lacking any deeper analysis—that it's merely a collection of disparate historical anecdotes whose purpose is to amuse. Hmmm... Do you agree...or disagree?


      New Words:
      • Neologisms (32): a newly coined word or expression.
      • Marcelled (41): A hairstyle characterized by deep regular waves made by a heated curling iron.
      • Pellagra (71): vitamin deficiency disease most frequently caused by a chronic lack of niacin (vitamin B3) in the diet.
      • Probity (78): the quality of having strong moral principles; honesty and decency.
      • Taciturn (162): reserved or uncommunicative in speech; saying little
      • Petulance (224): the quality of being childishly sulky or bad-tempered
      • Luxuriant (255): (of vegetation) rich and profuse in growth; lush.;  
        (of hair) thick and healthy
      • Plentipotientary (288): a person, especially a diplomat, invested with the full power of independent action on behalf of their government, typically in a foreign country
      Book References:


      Good Quotes:
      • First Line: On a warm spring evening just before Easter 1927, people who lived in tall buildings in New York were given pause when the wooden scaffolding around the tower of the brand-new Sherry-Netherland Apartment Hotel caught fire and it became evident that the city's firemen lacked any means to get water to such a height.
      • Last Line: She died in 2001 at the ripe age of ninety-four, the last person of consequence to this story to have lived through that long, extraordinary summer.
      Table of Contents:
      • Prologue
      • May: The Kid
      • June: The Babe
      • July: The President
      • August: The Anachists
      • September: Summer's End
      • Epilogue

      References:

      Monday, June 2, 2014

      The Book of Forgiving

      Book: The Book of Forgiving, the Fourfold Path for Healing Ourselves and Our World
      Author: Desmond Tutu and Mpho Tutu
      Edition: eBook
      Read:  May 31, 2014

      Review Updated December 10, 2016
      269 pages
      Rated: 5 out of 5

      Synopsis:
      Non-fiction book on forgiving. The authors go through a process they call the Fourfold Path. This consists of:

      • Telling the story
      • Naming the hurt
      • Forgiving the person
      • Releasing or renewing the relationship.
      All of these steps are done, not only from the mouth but also with the heart. Each of these are given a chapter discussion.in addition, the Tutu's set the stage for the Fourfold Path by talking about why we need to forgive and what is forgiveness. After discussing, the path, they then talk about the the need to forgive and forgiving yourself.

      Each chapter contains the Tutu's thoughts and teaching. Then they offer us a prayer concerning the chapter topic. A summary of the chapter's teaching is provided, followed by a meditation for us. Through out the book, there is a stone ritual. The stone is representative things in the chapter, usually about forgiveness. You are asked to visualize aspects of this chapter through the stone. Finally, you are to keep a journal of your journey towards forgiveness.



      Thoughts:
      Two truths:
      1) there is nothing which cannot be forgiven
      2) there is nobody who does not deserve to be forgiven.
      Upon these two truths, the Tutu's build this book. You can think of some pretty horrific things which gave happened, but the Tutu's gave probably seen or even experienced worse. They make a point that without forgiveness, the alternative is internal strife which will break out onto someone eventually The other thing which comes to my Christian mind is the second point. When we pray the Lord's Prayer, we ask for forgiveness like we have forgiven others. Without this forgiveness,we reject Christ's forgiveness.

      Until we can forgive, we remained locked in our pain and locked out of the possibility of experiencing healing and freedom... Without forgiveness, we remain tethered to the person who has harmed us. (21). The Tutu's show that there is harm in not forgiving. When we forgive, we cut the chain which binds us to the wrong we feel. By releasing the chain we are set free. As the Tutu's said, we forgive for ourselves, in our own self-interest.

      They also show that offering a conditional forgiveness, such as I will forgive you if you apologize, leaves the offender holding the cards on the forgiveness end. This allows the offender to continue to manipulate the situation. It is better to make our forgiveness based upon our own desire to offer forgiveness than upon some action by someone else. This is true, particularly if the forgiveness is not offered in person.

      Forgiveness is not ignoring the truth of a situation. Rather it is the process of revealing truth, confronting an issue, in truth. Forgiveness is not saying something did not happen, rather that it did, it hurt, and part of re-veiling the hurt.

      Forgiveness is not denying the harm caused by being wronged. Forgives is part of coming to terms in truth and honesty. It gives voice to the wrongs suffered.

      The key is how we respond to pain and harm. There are two cycles we can follow. The first is our natural reaction: cause the offender pain and harm, to retaliate. The second is to heal-not only the other person and our relationship with them, but ourselves. This choosing leads us into the Fourfold Path.

      The Tutu's point out that being hurt and causing hurt are flip sides of an action. Consequently we do need to learn how to work through hurt. Sadness, pain, anger and shame are all reactions which occur from hurt. Admitting our wounds allows us to start healing, as well as starting to see the wounds from the other persons perspective. By seeing our mutual woundedness, we share humanity. By rejecting it, we reject ours and others dignity. We cannot move out of a revenge cycle to forgiveness without acknowledging our hurt. We can choose reconciliation or retribution; to be healed or to hurt.

      Healing is restoring our dignity and the dignity of others. It is not revising the event or saying it did not happen.

      There is not a timeline on forgiveness. It is a process. All anyone can do is point another to the path of forgiveness.

      Tutu addresses can anyone be beyond forgiveness? He draws on his Christian background to address this. He says no. No person is such a monster that they lack a moral conscience. All humans are a child of a God, even when they do deeds which are horrific. They can still be saints by re-establishing relationships with God and humans. The acts can be condemned and the person punished for them, but that does not remove the persons humanity. We can just as easily be that person. He later on talks about the horrific events in places like Rwanda. During their internal war, many people became barbaric. But afterwards, a commission called for forgiveness of those who were caught up in the events. In this way a measure of healing took place.

      Stories are the method which we understand our hurt. Our stories are often have discontinuity or are broken. But they are how we come to term with the facts of our hurt. Often we feel our dignity has been slighted. By telling our story, we learn how to reacquire our dignity. When you tell your story, you are no longer alone-you have partners. But the story you tell must be true-as far as you know. But additional truth may surface over time-be open to it. Also, the stories of hurt may need to be told many times to understand your own hurt. I do not get the impression it is to slander or hurt the offender, but to create an internal understanding. To come to an acceptance of what happened and what it means about yourself. To relieve yourself from being trapped.

      Tutu then addresses whom to tell your story to. The ideal person is the person who hurt you. But there needs to be receptiveness to the idea of reconciliation. But first, tell it to someone you can trust. Also, depending on the circumstances you may need to bring along someone.

      Naming the hurt is to put a name to the emotion(s) which the hurt generates. Healing requires that we put pieces of our hurt stories into a coherent order, and assembly of facts. We need to own our feelings, turning from a victim to freedom from our resentment, anger or shame. Disassociation from our emotions and experience does not bring release, but repression-it will still hurt. It is truth which is the surgical knife which cuts to the core of the issues.

      When we ignore pain, it grows bigger and bigger, like an abscess that is never drained,... The Tutu's echos Tournier's thoughts-Nothing makes us so lonely as our secrets. It is through naming the truth of our hurt do we start to heal. By naming what has hurt us, we no longer are passive, no longer denying our hurt, but  being released from the. Bondage of being tied to the hurt. It allows us to share our hurt with others and allows us to empathize with other peoples hurt.

      Try to express the hurt as soon as you can. Healing comes quicker that way.

      Forgiveness does not preclude justice being served.

      Forgiveness enables you to tell a new story about what has happened to you. Instead of a victim, you are now the victor. Instead of demonizing the perpetrator, you start to understand their humanity. So your story goes beyond the facts and hurts to understanding and compassion.

      As part of the forgiveness process, there is a decision to be made: to renew or release the relationship. This is a choice where there is several considerations: safety and security, additional emotional hurt. Releasing, letting go, of a relationship is a valid option. Redeeming or renewing the relationship is the preferred. But even renewing the relationship does not make it the same as before. Change has happened, scar tissue has formed. Part of renewing the relationship is to understand and acknowledge our part of the conflict.

      The last part f the book talks about when we need forgiving. Sometimes the act is not an intentional one, but more of a side-effect. Such as Tutu speaking out against apartheid causes the family stress and grief from being harassed. Tito asks his wife forgiveness for that. Which is harder to forgive or to be forgiven; to ask for forgiveness or to say you are forgiven? I think each comes from a place of humbleness.

      Some steps along this path are:
      1. Admit the wrong
        1.  How do we admit we have wronged? State the facts and affirm the hurt we caused. Have integrity.
        2.  What if I was justified?
        3.   What if the person does not know
        4.  What about the consequences?
      2. Witnessing the Anguish and Apologizing
        1.  How do I witness the anguish?  Being picky about details does not leave room to hear the anguish the person is feeling. Empathize rather than legal.
      3. Witness the Anguish
        1.  I am sorry
        2.   How do I apologize
        3.  If I cannot apologize directly
      4. Asking for Forgiveness
        1.    Anomalous Apology sites:
          1. http://www.imsorry.com/
          2. http://www.perfectapology.com/ 
          3. http://www.joeapology.com/
          4.  347-201-2446
        2. How do I ask for forgiveness? Neither side wishes to be a victim or perpetrator forever. Tutu notes that no one can place remorse into anybody's heart.
        3. What if they do not forgive? You cannot force forgiveness, do not try to force it.
        4.  How do I make amends? Making amends many times is about restoring yourself to wholeness, as well as healing the rift between you and others.
      5. Renewing or Releasing the Relationship
      Self forgiveness, like forgiving others frees us from the past. But it is not a free pass to say all right with the world. One must still walk the fourfold path, seeking to right what was wronged. Self forgiveness requires a change in ourselves. What does self-forgiveness require?
      1. Truth
      2. Truth about our feelings and guilt
      3. Humility
      Forgiveness calls us into unknown territory. We need to break  what caused the wrong, the hurt, in the first place. Guilt is connected with the German word gelt which means to repay. It is an action word-we have done something which we feel was wrong. Shame is different. Rather than doing something, we have a state of being. We feel shame. Shame wants us to hide; truth seeks the light.


      Evaluation:
      This book is written for those who need forgiveness whether they want to forgive or to be forgiven. (8) So states the Tutu's in the initial chapter. The corollary to this direction is, what is forgiveness, how do we do it and what does forgiveness look like? The Tutu's come up with some very good answers to these in both through their teaching and by practical examples.

      They walks through a process called the Fourfold Path which leads you through a way to forgive. The path is clear; but the process can be difficult. While not comprehensive nor a text book on forgiveness, the Tutu's do show with simplicity how to walk this path. This is a book I would recommend to anyone who has hurt someone else or who has been hurt. In other words, all of us.




      Notes from my book group:
      December 8, 2016
      It was well received. Comments included things like it was understandable and spoke to them. It lifted some of the issues which hold guilt over us about forgiving, such as forgive and forget. The use of the stone as an exercise put visual to how something unforgiven can continue to affect you. The one negative is that the term Fourfold path sounded almost like an Asian religious term.

      I think I need to rethink the use of the stone. I have a tendency to think that things like this is a bit gimmicky. But how Tutu was using it in places it was an effective way to visualize the effect of an offense on a person until they are ready to forgive.



      The problem with reading a book like this is I want to turn it into a study and get personal, rather than a book group which is exploring the book.
      • Why did I choose this book?
        • Originally I was looking for a book by Desmond Tutu to better understand who he is. I saw this book as an ebook at the Fresno library and started reading it. I thought his, and his daughter's writing style was simple and straightforward. Not only that, but that they were able to bring their experiences into everyday life. (Other books submitted was Night by Ellie Wiessel and The Prayer Journal by Flannery O'Connor)
      • What part of this book where you most impressed by?
      • Do you agree with the Tutu's that there is nothing which cannot be forgiven and thatthere is nobody who does not deserve to be forgiven? What about truly “bad” people-Hitler, Ida Imin, ….) How does the Lord's Prayer fit into your answer?
      • What aspects of forgiveness were brought home to you?
      • The Tutu's say, Until we can forgive, we remained locked in our pain and locked out of the possibility of experiencing healing and freedom... Without forgiveness, we remain tethered to the person who has harmed us. Why?
      • Has this book been worthwhile? How come or why not?
      • Was the exercises at the end useful-prayer, stone and journal?
      • Was there a falsehood about forgiveness that was exposed?
      • What was the best discovery about forgiveness that this book showed?
      • What other ways or methods have you found which works in granting forgiveness (besides the Fourfold Path)?

      Not all questions were asked or in this form.





      New Words:

      • Ubuntu(14):  humanity
      • Gacaca (240):  part of a system of community justice inspired by tradition and established in 2001 in Rwanda
      • Internecine (241): of or pertaining to conflict or struggle within a group, mutually destructive, characterized by great slaughter; deadly
      Book References:

      Good Quotes:

      • First Line: "He had many wounds."
      • Last Line: (from the final prayer) It [the journal] tells how I finally broke free from being defined by injury and chose to become a creator again offering forgiveness accepting that I am forgiven, creating a world of peace.
      •  The quality of life on our planet is nothing less more than the sum of our interactions with one another. Pg 9
      • For every injustice, there is a choice. Pg 11
      • The traumas we have witnessed or experienced live on in our memories. Pg 20
      • Until we can forgive the person who harmed us, that person will hold the keys to our happiness, that person is our jailer. Pg 16 
      • Forgiveness is not dependent on the actions of others. Pg 26.
      • None of us wants to have our life story to be the sum of all the ways we have been hurt. Pg 51
      • When we tell the truth about our hurt and loss, we lessen the power it has over us. Pg 91
      • Forgiveness means giving up all hope for a better past. Lily Tomlin. pg 98
      • We can't let go of feelings that we don't own. Father Micheal Lapslet, 107
      • You may not have had a choice in being harmed, but you can always gave a chose to be healed. (123)
      • Unless you seek forgiveness from those you have harmed, you will find your are bound inside two prisons-the one you are in physically and the one you have around your heart. It is never too late to repair the harm you have caused. ... No one can lock away your ability to change. No one can lock away your goodness or your humanity. (188) quote from Eugene de Kock
      • It can be very hard to forgive others, but often it can be harder still to forgive ourselves. (206)
      • Forgiveness is at the core of peacemaking. (241)
      • The most beautiful people we have known are those who have known defeat, known suffering, known struggle, known loss, and have found their way out of the depths. These persons have an appreciation, a sensitivity, and an understanding of life that fills them with compassion, gentleness, and a deep loving concern. Beautiful people do not just happen. Quoted from Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, Death: The Final stage of Growth, 96
      Table of Contents:
      •  Introduction: Into Wholeness
      • Chapter 1: Why Forgive
      • Chapter 2: What Forgiveness is Not
      • Chapter  3: Understanding the Fourfold Path
      • Chapter  4: I-Telling the Story
      • Chapter 5: II-Naming the Hurt
      • Chapter 6: III-Granting Forgiveness
      • Chapter 7: Renewing or Releasing the Relationship
      • Chapter 8: Needing Forgiveness
      • Chapter 9: Forgiving Yourself
      • Chapter 10: A World of Forgiveness

      References:

          Saturday, May 10, 2014

          Love, Life and Elephants

          Book: Love, Life and Elephants
          Author: Daphne Sheldrick
          Edition: eBook from library
          Read:  May, 10, 2014 - unfinished
          629 pages
          Rated: 2 out of 5

          Synopsis:
          Autobiographical on Daphne Sheldrick's life in Keneya. Her husband was the head of the Tsavo National Park.The book tells of her upbringing in Africa and then her subsequent marriage to a game warden in Kenya. There she meets her future husband, David Sheldrick. The story continues on with how she started raising elephants, rhinos and other assorted orphaned animals in the park.



          Evaluation:
           How do you look at a book where the content should be compelling, but the writing is not? That is the problem with I had with this book. No matter how hard I tried, I could not get into this book, consequently I did not finish it.



          I think she could have done better by either having a professional writer write the book or hiring a ghost writer. Her telling of her childhood was to establish the basis for her life-long love of animals. But what I read started out as interesting, but rough, and then degenerated into the minutia of a childhood. This type of writing continues on throughout the book. It seems like whatever orphaned animal crosses her path, she becomes inseparably attached to. She probably was, but after reading how she was specially attached to a number of animals, one gets the feeling that there was no special relationships because they were all special. I suspect this is the fault of the writing, not what she was trying to describe.

          One criteria which I have for looking at a book or any other piece of writing is could I have written this book? If so, the writing is not very good, consequentially the storyline behind it needs to be extremely compelling. I think the story could have been, but after a month of trying, I could not get more than halfway through it. I think that to someone with a strong interest in animals, particularly Africa, this would have been a good book to read.


          (I should note that my book group enjoyed this book. Guess that makes me the old crumudgeon.)

          Notes from my book group:


          May have been a Smithsonian pick.
          Reliving the period of the Mau Mau uprising.


          References:

              Wednesday, May 7, 2014

              Call of the Canyon

              Book: Call of the Canyon
              Author: Zane Grey
              Edition: eBook from Gutenberg
              Read:  May 2014

              259 pages
              Rated: 3 out of 5

              Synopsis:

              New York socialite Carley Burch's finance arrives home after World War I, a wreck of a man, both physically and mentally. Glenn Kilbourne has been gassed and seen the horrors of war. He feels that his country has deserted him and his comrades. He has never been comfortable with the New York scene and so decides to move out West-probably to die.

              As Carley starts to get letters from Glenn, the letters continue to get more mysterious. Finally after a year, Carley decides to pay a visit to where Glenn is living in Arizona, along Oak Creek and its canyons, close to what we know as Sedona today. Carley expects to trundle Glenn back to New York, but quickly realizes there are complications. First Carley herself begins to see what the attractions of Oak Creek. Second, Glenn is on the road to healing and is in no frame of mind to leave. Third, Carley realizes she is a city girl. So she breaks the engagement.

              But a strange thing happens when Carley comes back to New York. She sees her life through new eyes. Eyes which are now discontent with the shallowness of the New York high life. After awhile, she cannot take it anymore and heads back to country above Oak Creek Canyon and to what she hopes will be her reunion with Glenn.

              Thoughts:


              In describing a New Years Eve celebration, Grey describes the scene in Hew York as a "gay and thoughtless" crowd. This is the impression which Grey gives of New York. People who are trying to escape knowing about their own shallowness. Rather than growing depth, the people Grey talks about build a productive shell around themselves. Some do it with mindless activity, others through alcohol, and still others by putting on blinders. Glenn recognizes this by saying before the war, his love was  “selfish, thoughtless, sentimental, and boyish”. Grey's solution is to go out West.

              What Grey illustrates is notion that people out West are more forthright. He records an exchange between Carley and a hotel clerk, where the clerk says to an impatient Carley that people out here usually ask for what they want. Is this true today? Probably a bit more true as Americans are known for being more bold in their speaking.

              But Grey's thoughts on the West is even more than that. It is the West is some kind of Nirvana which will either correct what is in a person or kill them. But it will mostly correct them. The West's almost magical powers to heal and cleanse the soul is a theme throughout the book. I wonder if this is true anymore? Has the West, particularly in California, become more like the New York of Grey's story? All is meaningless, all is play? Even Sedona, close to where the story is set, may be on the path to the commercialism which leads to meaninglessness.

              In the end, Grey puts the thoughts in Carley's mind, the lesson of the West is to face an issue, not hide it. No dispute here. We can avoid some issues, but most hit us, usually between the eyes.

              When this book was written, World War I had been over for six years. Zane Grey saw how the returning soldiers had been treated, even those who had been crippled by the war. He threads two lines through this book. First, there was the sons of the rich who avoided the war. Grey paints them as cowards, getting rich at the expense of those who fought. Those who either field due to the riches greed or were wounded, gassed, whose protection did not stand up due to inferior quality. The rich danced while soldiers died.

              But even more disturbing is how returning soldiers were treated. The healthy could not get their old jobs back. Even more of concern was the men who were wounded were leftover survive on their own, without even being given thanks, let alone aid.

              Carley says “I love people, not places”. Glenn's response is that is what is wrong. How so? I think as a Christian, Christ seemed to love a person more than possessions. But reading in the Old Testament, there is definitely something special about certain places, particularly where God has been. So I think his is a false dichotomy. It is an either or, but we are to understand the roles of each. What tole does a place have in God's creation? What role does a person have in His love? 

              Grey's thoughts on the weakness he sees in our nation in the 1920's, and I would assume now as well, is rather simple, and some would say outdated. His solution is work and children. Later, he enlarges upon this when he says, The things you were born to are love, work, children, happiness.”  These are words given to Glenn as he talks to Carley. Carley is a modern independent women who thinks this is too domestic, too outdated. But Glenn's thoughts are that  we need to go basic, to get back to meaning. Finding purpose through raising our young and providing for them. Later on he talks about marriage in the same light. That New York socialites view  marriage as a means of escape, an escape from the life of boredom.  Instead a Grey views it as a response to the responsibility to progress the American way of life. I think the argument is a bit shallow, not because it does not have some merit, but because why does this give you purpose? In a lot of ways, it only leads you to filling time. The basic question is what gives work and children meaning?

              I think this is not a modern book, so what Grey presents would not sit well with very many feminists.

              I've found out here that I want to do things well. The West stirs something in a man. It must be an unwritten law. You stand or fall by your own hands. Back East you know meals are just occasions—to hurry through—to dress for—to meet somebody—to eat because you have to eat. But out here they are different. I don't know how. In the city, producers, merchants, waiters serve you for money. The meal is a transaction. It has no significance. It is money that keeps you from starvation. But in the West money doesn't mean much. You must work to live. (67-68) several interesting things about this section. First the remark about wanting to do things well. Some of the context is just survival. But even more so,Glenn is saying that your work shows you what kind of a person you are. The pride of your work, vs the partying mentality.

              I find it interesting the emphasis Grey places on a meal. It is not merely to fuel your body, or as a social engagement. To Grey, it is part of the pride and reward. A good meal is the reward of doing your work well.

              Flo talked eloquently about the joys of camp life, and how the harder any outdoor task was and the more endurance and pain it required, the more pride and pleasure one had in remembering it. I suspect that is true all the way around. The harder the task, when accomplished, the better you feel. Maybe that is why I like backpacking. As I walk and ache, the rest that night feels so much better.

              He might have been failing to do it well, but he most certainly was doing it conscientiously. Once he had said to her that a man should never be judged by the result of his labors, but by the nature of his effort. (147).  Today it is all about results than effort. What can you. Do for me rather than did you do your task to the best of your ability. While the results must be there eventually, results are not the only thing.



              Evaluation:
              Let me begin by saying, this was my first Zane Grey book. My wife and I were visiting Sedona, AZ. As hikers, we enjoy walking around and seeing things. We quickly learned that Sedona's fame owes a lot to Zane Grey's book, The Call of the Canyon. So I quickly downloaded the book from Gutenberg and started reading. It is always interesting reading a book at the place where the setting is.


              Grey's description of the area around the Canyon was spot on and I enjoyed comparing the book descriptions with the hike we took up the West Fork of Oak Creek. The romance between Carley Burch and Glenn Kilbourne was a bit dry, and pretty much unexplained. How did a rich girl meet a working class man? When Carley returns back to Arizona after breaking off the relationship, what kind of reception was she thinking about when she returned?

              But I was surprised with the social commentary which Grey had about the returning WW I veterans. Also he spoke a lot about the social life and values of the New York upper class, particularly in comparison with the life lived in Arizona.

              All in all, it was an enjoyable book, particularly since we are in the area.  Will I read more of Grey's books? Well, I will not turn it down, but I may not actively seek them out-I have a pretty good backlog right now.

              As I am writing this review, the Slide Fire of 2014 is burning right where this book takes place. I wonder what will be left of it?

              New Words:

              • Lunger(15):  a primitive neandrathal-like creature known for its muscular build and four legged running ability.  Also may mean a person with a lung disease
              • Spoon(39): behave in an amorous way; kiss and cuddle
              • coquette(40): a woman who flirts lightheartedly with men to win their admiration and affection; flirt.
              • Trencheon(67): the club carried by a police officer; billy; a staff representing an office or authority; baton.
              • cognomen(71): a distinguishing nickname or epithet;
                the third of usually three names borne by a male citizen of ancient Rome
              • alacrity(72): cheerful readiness, promptness, or willingness:
              • hydrophobia(76): another name for rabies; fear of drinking fluids, esp that of a person with rabies, because of painful spasms when trying to swallow.
              • petrifaction(79): the act or process of petrifying; the state of being petrified.
              • Souse(104): liquid, typically salted, used for pickling; drunken
              • miasmas (154): a dangerous, foreboding, or deathlike influence or atmosphere.
              • Resurgam(156):  Latin for I shall rise again.
              • Boches(190): a German, especially a soldier.
              • Ken(200): one's range of knowledge or sight.
              • fin-de-siecle(206): of, relating to, or characteristic of the close of the 19th century and especially its literary and artistic climate of sophistication, world-weariness, and fashionable despair
              • sloe-eyed(227): having soft dark bluish- or purplish-black eye;  having slanted eyes
              • stentorian(252): loud and powerful.
              Book References:
              • Tennyson, The Lotus Eaters

              Good Quotes:

              • First Line:   What subtle strange message had come to her out of the West?
              • Last Line:  Lee Stanton was the lucky bridegroom.... Carley, the moment I saw you I knew you had come back to me.
              •  Jealously was an unjust and stifling thing.  Pg 33
              • ...misery, as well as bliss, can swallow up the hours. Pg 88to know the real truth about anything in life might require infinite experience and understanding. Pg 90
              • Money is God in the older countries. But it should never become God in America. If it does we will make the fall of Rome pale into insignificance. Pg 137

              References:

                  Thursday, April 10, 2014

                  Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet

                  Book: Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet
                  Author:Jamie Ford
                  Edition:eBook
                  Read: April 10, 2014
                  490  pages-includes author comments and reading guide
                  Rated: 4 out of 5

                  Synopsis:
                  This is a story told in parrellel about the same person 45 years apart. A story of finding love, losing love, having a different love, and finding love again.

                  The Chinese and Japanese have had animosity towards each other. But this is a story about two individuals overcoming that animosity and finding love. But the route is not straight and full of obstacles, including time. 

                  The author interweaves  his story, going between the mid-1980's when Henry's wife has died and he is not sure of his relationship with his son. But the other half of Henry's story concerns him growing up in Seattle in a Chinese neighborhood, with a strict Chinese father, being sent to a white school. There he meets the only other Asian in the school, a Japanese girl named Keiko. As the relationship develops, he first faces disapproval and eventual being cut off from his father. Keiko and her family, eventually gets caught up in the Japanese internment of World War II. Here he loses track of the love of his life to gain a love which lasts a lifetime. Through understanding this story, Henry's son sees him through different eyes and creates a different kind of respect.


                  Thoughts:
                  Ford introduces certain words at the beginning of the story, such as scholarship. Part of the fun of this book is to recognize how Ford weaves these words throughout the book. Going back and rereading the story with this in mind was worthwhile for me.

                  I am Chinese (or Japanese). What roll does national identity play in this book? In my life? That is a good question for me? To those born in America, they are Americans first. To Henry's father, he wants his son to be American, but not with all of the values of America. Such as the scandal of having a Japanese girlfriend. Ford works through some of these tensions through the life of Henry and his sone Marty. But there really is no definitive answer. Ford's skill is to weave the story so you see the tension.


                  Ford describes the ultimate parent-child communication gap. Parent wants child to speak only in English so they can become Americanized. But the parent speaks only Chinese. How did the parent expect him to talk with them? Eventually Henry lives with this gap, but probably never accepts it. That is what hurts him so with his relationship with his own son.

                  Some of the phrases Ford uses are a bit of a stretch, like he is trying to be clever, but the saying is forced. Such as when he initially describes Mrs Beatty, comparing her to a kennel dog which does not foul his own habitat, Ford says that Beatty does not eat her own cooking.

                  There is a description of Henry shaving Ethel's head when she has cancer. This is describes as part of the mechanics of dying. He compares this process of caring as being similar to gently crashing a jet into the side of a mountain. While the phrase is vivid, it does not have the power to carry me beyond the words.

                  A quarter to buy a piece of candy after the funeral, but Henry keeps it to remember his wife. To Henry, it was a promise of so etching better. What was that something better? Later Henry leaves the coin on top of Ethel's grave. This was the promise of happiness. How so?

                  In the chapter speaking American Henry thinks that his father does not like jazz because it is different. How much do we acquire our tastes by differences? In food, in culture, in people?  But there is something comforting about things we know, even dangers. If we tend to only the things we know, that gives a sense of security. If we go to differences, then lack "being home". We should learn how to tell apart what is good and bad based upon rightness, not on differences.

                  One thing which I was wondering about was what did Ethel, Henry's wife, think of Keiko? Was there jealousy? Was there competition? Or acceptance? Was Ethel complicit in keeping Keiko's letter's from Henry? Then when Henry was looking through the crates of the Japanese interment stuff, was Henry being unfaithful to his dead wife? What was Henry looking for? Lost love? A time in the past of happiness? One statement which stands out is that the more he realized what he'd known all along, Ethel would always approve of things that might make Henry happy.

                  Ford in telling of a white person, trying to make a deal with Henry's father to take land in Japantown. This is ok with Henry's father, but Henry as interpreter mixes up the message, on pupose, these men are speaking to each other. So there is no deal. Henry is expecting to feel some elation or a sense of victory for doing right. Instead, there is only a feeling of exhausted relief and guilt. This often is the result offing right. You feel like you could have done things differently, better, without a sense of wrong. This drains you.

                  In the chapter called Records, Ford shows he can turn a phrase or two. First, he says normal abnormal faces. Just strikes me as an interest use of opposites. Then he says that even pigs have standards. This is in contrast to the kids at Henry and Keiko's school who are piggish in their behavior.

                  It is very easy to take care of only your own, particularly if you do not like the person being threatened. That was the experience of Henry's family with the Japanese who were being rounded up. But how much different am I? Would I stick my neck out for someone else?


                  Evaluation:
                     You will need to read this book twice. Not because the plot is complicated. Nor because of large, archaic words. Not because the author is cloudy in his writing. But because on first reading you do not catch the nuances Ford uses. Such as the word scholarship. When Henry Lee's son comes in and talks about giving his father a scholarship to complete his school, he does not, nor does the reader understand complexity of emotions which this causes in Henry Lee. But once you read it, you understand.

                  This is a very readable book. What I got from reading the book was some of the flavor's of the Asian community as well as the concerns and prejudices of the times.

                  Even more than that, I enjoyed the flow of Ford's story telling. He speaks from his own family's background as well as the history of our own relocation camps of Japanese Americans during World War II. It is a story which as you read, it grows on you, you sort of hope he does not end it too soon.

                  I look forward his Ford's future writings.



                  Notes from my book group:
                  (I was not able to attend our book group's discussion)
                  What makes a person an American? Is it being born here? The values the person holds? What values? 

                  When a person emigrates to America, many times they want to become an American. How does Henry's family show this? In whatever ways do they not? How about the Okabe's?

                  Ford shows Henry still in love with Keiko after 40 years. Was he being unfaithful to Ethel? Even during there marriage?


                  After 9/11, what sentiments did we have? How did we react towards Muslims? Was there lessons learned from the WW II experience? In what ways did we accomplish the same things as during WW II? At what cost?


                  New Words:
                  • sienna (124):

                    Good Quotes:
                    • First Line: Old Henry Lee stood transfixed by all the commotion at the Panama Hotel.
                    • Last Line: "Ureshii desu", Henry said, softly.
                    •  ... the sun was setting, burnt sienna flooding the horizon. It reminded him that time was short, but that beautiful endings could still be found at the end of cold dreary days.  124


                    References:
                       
                      Barnes And Noble Reading Guide
                    1. Father- son relationships are a crucial theme in the novel. Talk about some of these relationships and how they are shaped by culture and time. For example, how is the relationship between Henry and his father different from that between Henry and Marty? What accounts for the differences?
                     2. Why doesn’t Henry’s father want him to speak Cantonese at home? How does this square with his desire to send Henry back to China for school? Isn’t he sending his son a mixed message? 
                    3. If you were Henry, would you be able to forgive your father? Does Henry’s father deserve forgiveness? 
                    4. From the beginning of the novel, Henry wears the “I am Chinese” button given to him by his father. What is the significance of this button and its message, and how does Henry’s understanding of that message change by the end of the novel? 
                    5. Why does Henry provide an inaccurate translation when he serves as the go-between in the business negotiations between his father and Mr. Preston? Is he wrong to betray his father’s trust in this way? 
                    6. The United States has been called a nation of immigrants. In what ways do the families of Keiko and Henry illustrate different aspects of the American immigrant experience? 
                    7. What is the bond between Henry and Sheldon, and how is it strengthened by jazz music? 
                    8. If a novel could have a soundtrack, this one would be jazz. What is it about this indigenous form of American music that makes it an especially appropriate choice? 
                    9. Henry’s mother comes from a culture in which wives are subservient to their husbands. Given this background, do you think she could have done more to help Henry in his struggles against his father? Is her loyalty to her husband a betrayal of her son? 
                    10. Compare Marty’s relationship with Samantha to Henry’s relationship with Keiko. What other examples can you find in the novel of love that is forbidden or that crosses boundaries of one kind or another? 
                    11. What struggles did your own ancestors have as immigrants to America, and to what extent did they incorporate aspects of their cultural heritage into their new identities as Americans?
                    12. Does Henry give up on Keiko too easily? What else could he have done to find her?
                    13. What about Keiko? Why didn’t she make more of an effort to see Henry once she was released from the camp?
                    14. Do you think Ethel might have known what was happening with Henry’s letters?
                    15. The novel ends with Henry and Keiko meeting again after more than forty years. Jump ahead a year and imagine what has happened to them in that time. Is there any evidence in the novel for this outcome?
                    16. What sacrifices do the characters make in pursuit of their dreams for themselves and for others? Do you think any characters sacrifice too much, or for the wrong reasons? Consider the sacrifices Mr. Okabe makes, for example, and those of Mr. Lee. Both fathers are acting for the sake of their children, yet the results are quite different. Why?
                    17. Was the U.S. government right or wrong to “relocate” Japanese Americans and other citizens and residents who had emigrated from countries the U.S. was fighting in WWII? Was some kind of action necessary following Pearl Harbor? Could the government have done more to safeguard civil rights while protecting national security?
                    18. Should the men and women of Japanese ancestry who were rounded up by the U.S. government during the war have protested more actively against the loss of their property and liberty? Remember that most were eager to demonstrate their loyalty to the United States. What would you have done in their place? What’s to prevent something like this from ever happening again?