Saturday, June 9, 2012

Hunger Games Trilogy

Author: Suzanne Collins
Edition: Nook
Read: June 2012
821 pages
Rated: 3 ½ out of 5


Synopsis:
Hunger Games pictures a  dystopian world where the United States, if not the entire world—it is not clear which—has been decimated through a civil war. The Capital has won the civil war and the Districts supply resources to make the Capital run. Each year two tributes-a male and a female--are selected from each of the 12 Districts to participate in the Hunger Games. The catch is that the Games are manipulated through the Gamemakers, who can unleash a variety of challenges and torments. The games are to the death with only one victor each game. All of the books are written in the first person, through the voice of Katniss Everdeen, a 16 year old female.

The first story tells how Katniss from District 12 competes in the games. The second book continues her story and her turning rebellion with the Capital. The last book then talks about the rebellion.

Thoughts:
This is not a deep book. But there are a few things which Collins touches on. I do not know if Collins puts these points in or they are there because as you cannot help saying something if you do write, even if you do not mean so.

  • What caused civilization to a point of near annihilation? Collins does not go into this. But she gives some hints, such as the need to be powerful, the lack of resources, and the need to be on top.
  • When faced with death, survival takes precedent over  goodness or being moral. Except for one character in the book. His love superseded everything, except for being “hijacked”.
  • What is right in war? When is killing ok?
  •  The people of the Capital have time for only leisure activities—they are the high-life people, while the people in the districts work. The people in the Capital go to more and more extremes to make a statement and to stand out.  Is this what happens when a life becomes meaningless, too full of leisure and not the pursuit of survival of meaning?


Evaluation:
 The first book is the best. It rated a four out of five. The storyline was pretty crisp and compelling. The writing was not remarkable, but as a whole it was engaging. The second and third books were more along the lines until either I or the author ran out of steam and decided to end the book. Collins tried to intersperse the action parts with descriptions of things like the President of the Capital's rose garden. But in reality, Hunger Games is a book of bloodshed, violence and something which Collins tries to make as romance.

Good Quotes:
  • First Line: When I wake up, the other side of the bed is cold.
  • Last Line: But there is much worse games to play.

References:

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The World According To Garp

Book: The World According to Garp
Author: John Irving
Edition: 20th Anniversary Edition, Hardback
Read:  March 2012
688 pages
Rated: 3 out of 5


Synopsis:
Garp is born to Jenny Fields, a woman who just wanted to be left alone. His conception was in a most unusual manner. This is from the first chapter and it goes down from there. Garp grows up, but not out of his mother. They go to Vienna so he can become a writer, but it is she who gets the first book out. After various encounters, both with sex and death, he comes home and gets married after he writes his first good story. Garp goes through his marriage and infidelities, the death of those whom he is close to, and his turning into a stay at home dad.  You throw in a Toad, sex changes and women cutting out their own tongues and you get the world of Garp. The story explores Garp and his world's complications.

Thoughts:
A book by a writer—where else do books come from?--about a writer will inevitably wind up talking about books. Irving makes a being point about his heroine, Jenny Fields, that she was the kind of women  who has a graceless seriousness which  makes more frivolous people uncomfortable. (42) She read books, not to discuss them, but to read them for herself. She would even attend classes at the school she was nursing at. Of course, if you have read a book you are puzzled about or enjoyed, you want to share it with others. On the other hand, if you are with a group of people in competition, you want to show your superiority by showing you have read the book, understood it better than anybody else, or at least have the book on your shelf.

To go on with the books, Garp, Fields son, does become a writer. When Garp submits to his publisher his third novel, which is at least as gross as Irving's novel, his publisher is really thinking that he does not want to publish the book. They are not that type of publisher. But he lets his cleaning lady read the novel. She likes it, to his surprise. Why? Because the book is true. Why is it rue? It is how people behave in reality. Is that why we read books? I read a book because it shows something about me, my world, and/or about my God.

Irving publishes two short stories in this book, which he attributes to Garp. I was wondering if he had these stories just laying around and wanted to publish them or if he wrote them specially for this book. The first story,  The Pension Grillparzer, has been published separately. The second was The World According to Bensenhaver. More of my pondering than a need to know. From a Wikipedia article, this is one of Irving's tricks.

The title of the book comes from something Garp's wife, Helen, says about his first good short story, The Pension Grillparzer. She said that we can glimpse what the world according to Garp would be like (194). In the story, the fantastic occurs. A bear riding a unicycle in a hotel room; fortunetelling gypsies; circus man who walks on his hands; a women who seemed to be married to everybody in the story. This is the world which Garp made up, and in many ways, the world Garp lived in. By this, I mean a different world than the world we see.

Garp realizes, too late, that his mother's real talent was that she had right instincts—she always did what was right. (575) After Jenny Fields book got published, she became a celebrity, outshining anything Garp did. The book was autobiographical and attracted the attention of the fledgling modern feminist movement. In her own way, she attracted the same type of people people who Garp imagined—women who cut off their own tongues, a Philadelphia Eagle tight end who had a sex change,  and other female outcasts. Garp, as sons will be, was embarrassed by all of this. She saw the needs of these women and tried to provide a place of shelter.

Garp needed something to do. (588). At this point, Garp had not written in awhile. He had faced one assassination attempt and was just in a rut. Irving correctly points out that unless we are doing something meaningful, we will decay or invent our own crisis'. This is what happens in retirement. Unless we find something which is meaningful to us, we have early heart attacks or become a nusiance.

Irving talks about Garp's writing, and it is a sad commentary on Garp. The best work he had done was his first.(589) Starts with a flash and ends with violence. As I read this I was wondering about Irving and was he fearing the same thing with his work? But he did write Cider House Rules after this novel.

I could relate to a statement—we skipped middle age altogether and moved directly into the world of the elderly.  (591)  This was said in reference to the amount of worry he, Garp, felt. Irving associates worry with old age while the freedom to be uninhibited by fear is more of the younger set. But I do not think so.  You see children  who are daredevils, but also some who will back away from ledges. But fear does cause Garp to reach out and try to protect his children.

Black and White. (623) Movements as they progress, and in this case, feminists, make it so you are either one of them or the enemy. There is no moderation of tone. This is true today as it was back when Irving write Garp.  Because of the radicalness of a movement, there is a strong tendency towards extremeness. We see this today with the liberals and conservatives, radical ecologists and Tea Party, prolife and prochoice. You cannot find any place of civility let along common ground.  Groups lose their original vision of a better world to live in when they dehumanize others.

In this book there are two examples extremism I will bring up—the Ellen Jamesians and the First Female Funeral. The Ellen Jamesians are a fictional group who cut out their tongues to symbolize their lack of voice. A girl of 12  was raped and then had her tongue cut out by her attacker. This group took this as a symbol. While the real Ellen James wanted nothing to do with the group. Garp had a hatred of this group which feed the young girl to write a letter disavowing the group. While Garp's Mom saw the neediness of these women.

When Jenny Fields died, a large group of females gathered at a university to have a funeral service for her. Garp was barred form attending. The reason? He is a man. So he went in disguise. Eventually he was found out and was forced to run for his life. What kind of group will not allow a man to attend his own mother's funeral? Remember this is fiction.

You know that a book is great when a person copies some sort of antics talked about in the book. Garp had a habit of cutting the engine, and lights, and then coasting up the driveway into his garage. His reason was not to wake the kids. On Click and Clack about a year ago, I heard the same thing. I just sort of snickered when I read the story. Unfortunately, I cannot find when this episode aired.

There is not much religion or room for religion in this book. But towards the end, while Garp is dying, Irving says so what, if there is no life after death? There is life after Garp... Even if there is only death after death (after death), be grateful for small favors. (649)  Sort of a human race in perpetuity. He goes further by saying that an ending occurs when those who are meant to peter out have petered out. All that's left is memory. (657)  Sort of a nihilist thought. Where a person lives and dies and there is no consequence to their being.  Even with memory, what is it except us? Because I remember my Grandmother, she influences my actions today. At some point, you need to say either Garp's life influenced how things will turn out or that it all does not matter.

No review of this book would be complete with sex. The reader needs to be warned that there is sex acts from the first chapter on. Some are done without passion, such as the one described about how Garp was conceived. Others are more noted. To Irving's credit, I do not think his descriptions are written to incite to lust, but to portray lust. Consequently they are more mechanical in description than something a teenager would read to lust. But the acts are very graphic, so the reader must be warned.

But if these scenes are not for some gratuitous reasons, why did Irving put them in?  Seemed like after each time Garp goes astray, something bad happens. When Garp is in Vienna, he teams up with a hooker. She dies. Garp becomes suspicious of his wife after many of his own philandering’s. In a sense, if you think about Irving's book enough, it becomes a morality play. You go astray, you will pay. 

Irving himself thinks the book is about lust. In the forward to the 20th edition, he talks about his 12 year old son going upstairs to read the book. Irving wonders what he would think about all the lust, and sex, in the book. His son has a different take, that the book is chiefly about death—the fear of death, or more particularly, the fear of death in an off-spring. In fac Irving talks about people coming up to him and offering him condolences on the death of his child—he has to say this is his imagination not reality.. One interesting note on lust—Wikipedia says that lust really means sexuality.

But does it make the book worth reading?



Evaluation:
 How do I evaluate this book? Is it the graphic sexual content? I do not think so, because when you get to the end of the story, you realize that there is a reason why Irving has it. Is it the skill in writing which Irving shows in the book? I do think there is skill in his story telling. Is it the messages he sends out to us? I do not know.

What I do know is that this is not a must read again book. I am debating if it is a must read once book. So there is conflict in what I read. Irving's skill in writing is top notch. But the graphic nature made me not want to read the book or even hear Garp's name. In the end, it is a book to think about and ponder.



Notes from my book group:
Could you talk a little about what you saw in this book? Why did you think our group would benefit from this book?   Irving is a fine writer, writes how people talk. He writes how intellectuals act.

Rest of the group: What was your reaction to reading this book?   There was the thoughts that Irving's writing is uneven. Sometimes it is a good read and then other times you wonder why he is being published. It was felt A Prayer for Meany was one of the good reads.

There was a question, about who was Irving's editor? The answer is that for five of his books, Harvey Ginsburg was the editor, starting with Cider House Rules , A Prayer for Owen Meany, A Son of the Circus, and A Widow for A Year.  Also, he ad an editor names Joe Fox-whom it sounds like was the editor for Garp.  You wondered if Irving disliked Fox that much that he made Garp's editor, John Wolf? Irving had dedicated his third book to Fox.

How old was Irving when he wrote this book? 34. Is his other books as violent and filled with sex? From the Wikipedia chart on him, yes. This one seems to be a bit more graphic.

In general, most of the book group was put off by the sex and violence in this book. Also by the degree and the quantity. Some felt this book was pornography.






What themes do you find in this book?
Death
Feminism
Lust
Morality
Which are the strongest? How does Irving present them? Which is the most compelling for you?

How is feminism portrayed in this book? By whom and what tyoe? Are they compelling? Jenny Fields, Ellen Jamisins, Roberta Murdoch, Helen Holms, Mrs Ralph, Jillsy Sloper? Women, even as victims, may not be good people.


How does Irving anticipate today's political discussions? Feminism, Tea Party, Radical Ecologists,  Prolife/ProChoice, … Is Irving an observer or a corrector?


Death is lurking throughout the book. How does Garp live with it? Can we learn from Garp on dealing with death or the fear of death? Walt, Jenny, Garp,


How does Irving use the Under Toad? Is that how you would portray the world you life in? Looking for the Under Toad?

How does Irving distinguish between sex and sexuality? Roberta Murdoch, the house by the sea, ...


Is the sex in Garp gratuatis? How so? How not? Are there reprocusions to the characters having sex throughout the first half of the book? What warning did you take away from it? Do you think Irving was trying to do a morality play?



New Words:

  • triptych (85): a set of three panels or compartments side by side, bearing pictures, carvings, or the like.
  • Slatternly (274): untidy and dirty through habitual neglect;  or of, relating to, or characteristic of a slut or prostitute
  • quadroon (515): A person having one-quarter Black ancestry.


Good Quotes:

  • It was a class war, … all wars were. (73)
  • Any place can be artistic, if there's an artist working there. (123)
  • Many couples never discover it[never in love]. Others marry, and the news comes to them at awkward moments in their lives. (207)
  • You only grow by coming to the end of something and by beginning something else. (253)
  • wherever the TV glows, there sits someone who isn't reading. (315)


References:



The Plot Against the Giant
First Girl
When this yokel comes maundering,
Whetting his hacker,
I shall run before him,
Diffusing the civilest odors
Out of geraniums and unsmelled flowers.
It will check him.


Second Girl
I shall run before him,
Arching cloths besprinkled with colors
As small as fish-eggs.
The threads
Will abash him.


Third Girl
Oh, la...le pauvre!
I shall run before him,
With a curious puffing.
He will bend his ear then.
I shall whisper
Heavenly labials in a world of gutturals.
It will undo him.

Wallace Stevens

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Financial Peace Revisited

Book: Financial Peace Revisited
Author: Dave Ramsey
Edition: Hardcopy, 2003
Read: March 2012
319 pages
Rated: 3 out of 5


Synopsis:
Financial Peace Revisited is a companion book to his Financial Peace University 13 week seminar. Much of the seminar is oriented towards people who are in big debt and need a way out. As such, its focus is narrow—how to be wise with your money.

Ramsey describes a different life-style. His slogan describes it: You are to live like no one else, so that you can live like no one else.

Thoughts:
The biggest point Ramsey makes is that debt is a drain on you, both financially, emotionally and goal wise. How can you be achieving great things when you worry about how to pay your bills. So he spends a considerable amount of words on why you need to be debt -free, why you need to be debt-free and how to get out of debt.

As an offshoot of this, there is a section on how to deal with creditors. He takes the stand that if you owe the money, you should pay off the debt, and as quickly as you can. But he recognizes and encourages the the debtor be protected from unreasonable harassment. He gives tools to work with the creditor to make this time livable. He encourages people in debt to figure out what they need to live on—food, transportation, utilities, housing—and then start paying off the debt. Come up with a realistic plan, paying off creditors.

One of the first things he points out, money is active (19). by this he means that just because you put away a dollar, that dollar's value does not stay equal to that value a year later. Inflation eats away at the value, while a dollar invested should grow.

He then talks about “Baby Steps” on getting out of debt and on to financial security and peace. These steps include:
  • Getting a $1,000 in savings
  • Start paying off your debt, from the smallest to the largest.
  • Save your emergency fund. This should be three to six months of your income.
  • Put 15% income into your savings
  • Save for college
  • Pay off your house
  • Invest

He notes that personal finance is who you are. It is a measure of your character. For example, by restraining your spending and only paying for items with funds you already posses speaks to a certain amount of discipline you posses. But by going into debt, you become beholden to someone else.

Communications between spouses makes it so you each know what is going on. The budget is a communication tool rather than an area where there is power struggle. It is important that each of the spouses comes to the table. The one more nerd-like (budget minded) may prepare the budget, but the other spouse will have revision authority. The important thing is each has equal say in the budget and spending plans of the family.

Some rules of thumb Ramsey talks about, includes:
  • Savings should be 10% of your take home pay
  • Giving should be 10-15% of your take home pay.
  • With a good emergency fund, you can raise the deductible on your insurances-home and auto—to $500 or $1,000.

The section he had on investing was the most needed for me. More of the motivation to invest rather than how to invest. That is one of the main short comings of this book in my mind. He is very much into motivations, but sometimes short on either fact or explanation. On the fact part, one of his favorite is about the effects of power of compounding. Cites that a person can put money away for 10 years at 12% and have more money at the end of 30 years than the person who waits 10 years and puts the money away for the next 20 years at 12%. Of course wht he does not play with is the effect of interest rates. Which gets into the second problem—he talks about being able to get 12% on your money. He cites that this is true for the last 69 years that in any decade, yo would have averaged 12% in 97% of the mutual funds.

But he has made me realize I need to be more focused on wisely getting a good return on the money we are charged with. His rule of thumb is to put 25% of your investment funds in four different types of mutual funds: balance fund, growth and income fund, growth fund, and international fund. Also as you have more to invest with you can look at an aggressive fun such as a small company fund or an aggressive growth fund. His rule is that a fund must have at least five years of track record with the current manager. He prefers 10-15 years. He expects 12% returns.

Buying is a significant area where you can save money. He has several techniques. He notes that people are non-confrontational. Consequently, if you work this, there is a good possibility you can pick up substantial savings by being strong-not obnoxious-in your areas. The idea is for both you and the seller to win. The seller because he can sell his item; you can win either with cost or terms. He has seven items to buy:
  1.  Always tell the truth
  2.  Use the power of cash
  3.  Walk away power
  4.  Shut up
  5.  That is not good enough
  6.  Good guy-bad guy If I give you this, what will you give me

Last things is another important area. Have a will—current, with power of attorney. Also make sure there is written instructions for a spouse for what they should do with the assets.

Evaluation:
 This is a book which is meant to be used, rather than thought about.  He is dogmatic in his approach, such as you should not have credit cards. On the other hand, he is dealing with people who have ruined their lives by over-extending themselves.  His methods I think will help most people who are in debt, if they have the discipline to carry out his strategy. For a person who is financially stable, much of what he has to say is rudimentary.

New Words:
  • Beta: Measure of volatility of a fund. A beta of 1 tracks perfectly with the S&P 500. A value greater than 1 indicate more swings than the SP500.


Good Quotes:
  • Measure wealth not by the things you have, but by the things you have for which you would not take money. (21) Unattributed
  • The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. Martin Luther King, Jr, Strength to Love, Chpt 3, On Being A Good Neighbor
  • Just as riches are an impediment to virtue in the wicked, so in the good they are an aid of virtue. St. Ambrose, as quoted by Dave Ramsey, pg 26
  • First, gained all you can, and, Secondly saved all you can, Then give all you can. John Wesley, Sermon 50, The Use of Money
  • Life is never made unbearable by circumstances, but only by lack of meaning and purpose. Viktor E. Frankl, as quoted by Dave Ramsey, pg 45
  • Almost any man knows how to earn money, but not one in a million knows how to spend it.  If he had known as much as this, he would not have earned it. Henry David Thoreau, Journal 1837-47
  • Attitude is the only difference between saving and hoarding. Larry Burkett, How to Manage Your Money.

References:

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Polar Dream

Book: Polar Dream, The First Solo Expedition by a Woman and Her Dog to the Magnetic North Pole
Author: Helen Thayer
Edition: NewSage Press, 2002
Read: Feb 2012
183 pages
Rated: 3 out of 5


Synopsis:
This is Helen Thayer's journal of her trip to the magnetic north pole and back. She acquires a dog at the last moment before leaving Resolute Bay in northern Canada. It tells of her preparation and why she wants to do this trip. As a mountain climber, she uses her compass to figure out where she is during a white out condition, which  probably saves her life(2). She becomes very interested becoming the first women to reach the Magnetic North Pole, solo.  Not only that, she is fifty years old and will be pulling 160 pounds of sled, with only a dog to accompany her

She talks about her pre-trip and the local's thoughts on what they felt was her ill fated effort to accomplish her solo task. How one local Inuit musher provided her a dog after she thought over how was she going to protect herself from polar bears.  Which he does and becomes her friend and companion on the trip. The book tells of her adventures with polar bears, storms, ice, and helpful strangers.


Thoughts:

Thayer was a world class athlete before this adventure, as well as an experienced mountaineer. She had been an international athlete for New Zealand—her birth country, the United States—her current country, and Guatemala. There is no mention why she competed for Guatemala. But she competed in the luge and the discus. (3) She climbed major peaks on all continents, including those above the 24,000' mark.

One of the reoccurring themes of the book is the need to set goals and plan for all contingencies. She does this over the two years prior to her adventure, with details on what to bring. She takes a two weeks tune up on location,  where she gets to know the people of the area and the environment she will be living in for a month.  But planning can does gets tough when you get conflicting advice. Such as what gun to bring along to stop a polar bear (12). It sounds like in reality, you probably will not be stopping a polar bear with a gun before it is able to hurt you bad. But it does seem like a needed weapon, if for no other reason that you do not feel defenseless.

The eating supplies were pretty basic—wondering what we should or could incorporate into our backpacking experience. Dehydrated rice, whole-milk powder, chocolate powder, oatmeal, granola, graham crackers, peanut butter cups, walnuts, and cashew nuts. Also some sort of high carb drink—maybe Cytomax? (13)  But as she admits, camp cooking is not her forte, nor her need. In her training, she would bring along a loaf of bread per day for her meals. (110)

The main character in the book, besides Thayer, is Charlie. Thayer acquired Charlie from a sympathetic Inuit who was much relieved to find that Thayer would bring a dog. She named him Charlie. This is where you wonder where she came up with the name. While vastly different from Steinbeck's book Travel's with Charlie, part way through the book, I had the feeling of the book should be called Thayer's Travel with Her Charlie. (15)  A good deal of the book is how she developed a trust for Charlie's instincts and the response which Charlie had. An example of this is found on page 96 where she says, It was a precious gift to be trusted and loved by a dog who had never learned trust and had never known human kindness. You can argue about what the Charlie was intending, but this is what Thayer felt. But I do think she goes over the top when she says that Charlie's good opinion was valuable. (127) Or again the thought of betrayal if she used some of his food in the hour of her need. (162) Both of these seem more to do with her than with Charlie's impressions.

Thayer does do a great deal of anthropomorphizing of her relationship with Charlie. Such as when Charlie takes a misstep and gets tangled up with Thayer. Thayer falls and gets made at Charlie. Charlie looks hurt. She resolves not to get upset with Charlie. (66) That in itself is a not possible reaction—if it was, wouldn't we be more patient with our spouses?

She describes her husband with the phrase he had a curiosity to see over the other side of the hill. (3) I think this is great. I like the guy.

She says that one of the reasons for her expedition was to learn to exist alone. (84) This was in context of a snowmobile expedition which was also going to the Magnetic North Pole. They turned back in a storm. She expressed relief that she would not meet up with them with the above sentiment. There is a couple of things which I find curious about her reason. First, did she exist alone? She did have radio contact and I assume the ability to call in a rescue flight, if possible. Also there was her companion, Charlie who was at her constant side. If she meant without human companionship, yes she did and you could tell the effects throughout the book. There was the part of knowing herself better and her capabilities. But there are also places where a second opinion would have served her well.

But even more so, the term, learn to exist brings in even more of a question. Do we do things which stretches our limits to exist or to learn about ourselves? To do more than just survive?

One of the interesting thing brought out by this book is her talking about what is the Magnetic North Pole. Evidently it moves around an area, sometimes a hundred miles in a day. So when scientists talk about the magnetic North Pole's location, they talk about the mean. (4)

One of the favorite items which I enjoyed is her bringing in the history of an area. Such as when the Franklin expedition got stuck in the area and perished. (25) Since this past summer I have found more and more abut Franklin and his wife. This was an interesting tie-in.

Bears, polar bears specifically, are Thayer's chief nemesis. She talks about what polar bears mean to the Inuit people (5). But also the dangers associated with them. She already knew how to use a gun from her upbringing. What she did not know was how to read the intentions of a polar bear. She got that training from the Inuits. (14). But as it turned out her best warning device was Charlie. She also realizes that the best plan for survival against the bears is to make it to the Pole and back, quick. No lagging around. (71)

Other problems she faced were:
  • Depth perception. Not only during white out conditions, but when the sun was blocked. She could not see the little shadows we all take for granted when we walk around things. At those times, she had to slow down so she would not stumble. (73)
  • Storms. To most of us, a rise in temperature brings relief from the Winter cold. To Thayer, a rise in temperature means a storm is approaching. So she prefers the cold of -45F to the warmth of -5F because of the winds and the storms which will come. This comes to a head when she nears the Magnetic North Pole. A storm slams into her when she is unprotected, tearing much of her supplies away. It also leaves her injured enough where she has blurry vision. (149)
  • Hunger. After the last storm, she needed to complete a week's worth of her journey with a water of the amount of water desired and about a day's worth of food.
  • Foastbite. This was from the first day when she had to search for her heavy gloves.
  • Thin or cracking ice. In most cases,  could use her ski's to balance out the stress over a crack in the ice (98). But in one case, where Charlie tried to warn her, the crack in the ice was more like a see-saw, where her weight sank an end of the floe. (142)

For a person who is a mountain climber, she makes a puzzling statement—she wanted to get away to a place where she was no longer dwarfed by her surroundings. This was around Sargent Point, where the cliffs loomed high over her, and to her were intimidating. Maybe because she was alone, or the particular characteristics of the cliffs, they were frightening, but it does seem like a strange reaction from a mountain climber. Or it may be because of being alone, every sense took on a stronger perspective. (98)

Part of Thayer's desire was to bring the Arctic experience to school age children. From the book, this was her first endeavor in this area. The book does not explain why she felt a strong need to do this. But since her return, she has started up a web site dedicated to bringing the Arctic to schools-see below.

She talks about lessons learned. The first was because during the plane trip, her sled got jumbled up and things were thrown around. She let some well-meaning people reload her sled. This lead to the first major crisis when she stopped on the first day and could not find her heavy gloves. Her first lesson was to learn to say No when she needed to. (20).  The payment for the lesson was frostbitten hands, which she had to deal with the entire trip. Another lesson is that fear is part of life, but you do not need to be overcome by fear. (23). This became an issue as she faced several polar bears over the course of the first several days. She learned that fear can beat you down and weaken you. But when confronted, you can stand against the fears and negate the wear and tear on you. Her mantra became Only emotional discipline is going to get me to the Pole. I have to push my fears behind me and think ahead to my final goal. (51) This, in part, is aided by routine, such as her skiing and navigational work. (79) Also another lesson for my own experience is that doing things in the cold or wind, and I will add rain, takes longer to do and your are more prone to mistakes. (66)

She also learns to face the physically tough challenges of a major expedition is one thing when you are part of a group. There is both the rigor of trying to uphold your end of the task and not let people down. But there is the comfort of having others around when you face doubts and obstacles you have a hard time overcoming when alone. But when you are alone, you have no one else to share your fears and concerns, to help with the chores, to let you take a little time off. This can be wearing on a long trip. (41) She notes that there is no way to prepare for the mindset required to be totally alone in the polar desert. (79)

One of the things she does to combat the mental exhaustion is to look back on her successes as well as the current moment of failure. She calls this her debits and credits. When she is down, she pulls from the credit stack. (70) But she also notes that a critical factor in an effort like her's is the to push on through discomfort and deprivation. It is the goal which pushes you. (134)

One of the debits is an incident of a fox which turned into a polar bear cub which turned into a full sized  polar bear. This was under a low light situation where Thayer was seeing outlines rather  images. The perspective was lost. So the size of the animal was lost until she started to approach the bear. After methodically backing away and firing her flare gun to scare away the bear, she decides that all animals are full sized polar bears until proven different. (80-81)

Religion does not seem to consume too much of Thayer. Except for a few “calling on the Lord” times of trouble, and a reference to the only reading material was a new Testament, (110) the book does not have any religious bent to it.

She concludes the book with the realization that even as she left her pickup point on the plane, looking back, her tracks were being swept away by the wind. There was little physically remaining of her trip. The only thing left was her memories, and Charlie.

Evaluation:

This is not one of those great exploration books. The prose is written pretty singular, along the lines of this is what happened. Which in some ways is a relief to some of the self-examination books on an adventure or the why in the world did this person take off like that. This is a women of experience talking about her adventure in her own words. So in that respect it is refreshing.

Notes from my book group:

The book group thought that Thayer was a bit crazy for doing this. Also we had a discussion about was she or any other activity like this putting other people's lives in danger? There was talk about other explorers who did die—where they not just as crazy?


New Words:
  • nanuk(5): polar bear
  • kamotik(13): wooden sled
  • lenticular (108) stationary lens-shaped  clouds, that form at high altitudes, normally aligned perpendicular to the wind direction.

Good Quotes:
  • It was the learning experience and the struggle to overcome the challenges that made the journey rewarding and the prize previous. (154)

References:

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Desert Drama: The Tragedy of the Korosko

Book:Desert Drama: The Tragedy of the Korosko
Author: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Edition: ePub, from Guttenburg.org
Read:  March 2012
181 pages
Rated: 3 1/2 out of 5

Synopsis:
An assortment of nationalities are on a cruise boat going up the Nile River in Egypt while England still retains control of that country in the 1890's. There are a couple Americans women, a couple of Irish descent, some Englishmen, including a retired colonel who served in India, and a Frenchmen. There had been unrest from the Dervish population from Somalian who are a sect of Muslims. But the unrest has been put down and things appear peaceful.

This party goes out on a trip to some ruins when a band of the Dervish soldiers capture them. The story tells of trip across the desert on camel back and the agonies of having to choose between converting to Islam and subsequently being sold into slavery, or being put to death. Of course, there is a rescue attempt.


Thoughts:
In the second chapter, Doyle has a discussion between an American and a Frenchman about why is Britain in Egypt. It is the Frenchman's opinion it is just to extract wealth from Egypt and to exert power. A few minutes later, a Brit wonders why England is still in Egypt since it is only a drain on Britain. Let the other countries defend Egypt. But then a third makes Doyle's case for keeping in Egypt:  it is because it is right to do so, even if it is unpopular or drain on a country's resources. (27). Three thoughts cross my mind:
  • First, what makes a nation great? It is not merely the accumalation of property, like a real-life Risk game. But it is what a nation does that makes it great. A great nation will stand up and defend those nations who are weak, to allow themselves to grow. It will stand up for rightness.
  • That leads to the second thought. A nation must have the moral direction to understand what is right and to want to proper gate it.
  • Lastly, do we as Americans have the moral compass to be a great nation? Do we know what is right? Or are we only millions of jabbering voices without understanding. I think at one time we knew what was right. There was a time in our nations history when we discovered the people in control had a shroud of morals, but not the flesh to go with it. Rather than repudiate them, we decided that we would not be lead astray again, so we will not be lead when a leader does come along with morals. Consequently, we wander without leading and morals.
Those are the ruins, solitary, unseen, unchanging through the centuries, which appeal to one's imagination. But when I present a check at the door, and go in as if it were Barnum's show, all the subtle feeling of romance goes right out of it. There seems to be a theme in many of my readings, which Doyle is picking up on. As we make places more accessible, we lose how to look on something. By making it easy to go to the ocean, it loses its power to heal; by making a road to the mountains, serenity disappears; by being shown art or remains, we no longer are in awe of them. I am not going Edward Abbey, but there should be a place in each of our lives where we can have a struggle to get to, making it special to us.

The Colonel is a typical very starchy Brit with much pride and even more honor. When it comes to ask an Egyptian for advice, it takes a lot to break him down to ask. I do not think Doyle meant this as a critique on the British, but it does show how our strengths can be our biggest weakness at times.

his Indian service had left him with a curried-prawn temper, which had had an extra touch of cayenne added to it by his recent experiences.”(115) nothing particular thought provoking, I just like this description of the Colonel's temper.

Doyle can create a bit of understated humor as well. The Colonel, during ordeal, aged considerably. His usual robust appearance, lagged. Overnight his hair turned from black to gray. But at the end, Doyle talks about how anymore the Colonel would now always tuck a little black bottle in his coat when they were traveling.



Evaluation:
   Even though this is Arthur Conan Doyle, this is not Sherlock Holmes and Scotland Yard. It is an entertaining book about tourists in 1890 or so Egypt who get captured by insurgents. It is written right in the middle of the Sherlock Holmes-Doyle did write several novels and short stories other than the master crime solver ones. It is fairly short, without mystery. Probably at the time, it was of interest to those in England because of circumstances in Egypt.

Is it worth a read today? Yes, but not a must read, but an interesting one from a good writer. One warning: a lot of language acceptable in 1890's, particularly concerning races and religions may be offensive to those reading it today. On the other hand, Doyle's descriptions will be reticent of some of the events in this day and age.

 


New Words:
  • dragoman(14): a professional interpreter.
  • emeute(20): A seditious tumult; an outbreak.
  • Dervishes: someone treading a Sufi Muslim ascetic path or "Tariqah", known for their extreme poverty and austerity. The Dervish State was an early 20th-century Somali Sunni Islamic state that was established by Muhammad Abdullah Hassan ("Mad Mullah"), a religious leader who gathered Somali soldiers from across the Horn of Africa and united them into a loyal army known as the Dervishes.
  • reductio ad absurdum(25): "reduction to absurdity; a common form of argument which seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its denial, or in turn to demonstrate that a statement is false by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its acceptance.
  • piastres(31): a fractional monetary unit of Egypt, Lebanon, and Syria worth one hundredth of a pound; formerly also used in the Sudan
  • hoopoes(42): a colourful bird found across Afro-Eurasia, notable for its distinctive "crown" of feathers.
  • doora(67): In Irish the word Dúr means "water", and Dúire means "of water", so the name means the parish of the water or bog.
  • jibbehs(68): 
  • cummerbund(72): a broad waist sash, usually pleated, which is often worn with single-breasted dinner jackets (or tuxedos). The cummerbund was first adopted by British military officers in colonial India as an alternative to a waistcoat, and later spread to civilian use
  • reis(74): head, chief, leader
  • tibbin(79): 
  • Baedeker(114): German publisher, notably of guidebooks for travelers; any of the series of guidebooks for travelers issued by the him or his successors; anyguidebook, pamphlet, or the like, containing information useful to travelers:
  • anodyne(165): not likely to provoke dissent or offense; inoffensive, often deliberately so. (Or a painkilling drug)
  • khor(167): watercourse, ravine
  • carmine(180): A purplish-red pigment, made from dye obtained from the cochineal beetle; carminic acid or any of its derivatives

Good Quotes:
  • First Line: The public may possibly wonder why it is that they have never heard in the papers of the fate of the passengers of the Korosko.
  • Last Line: “You have," said he, and their hands met under the shadow of the table”.
  •  There is no iconoclast in the world like an extreme Mohammedan. Pg 26
  • A man or a nation is not here upon this earth merely to do what is pleasant and profitable. It is often called upon to carry out what is unpleasant and unprofitable; but if it is obviously right, it is mere shirking not to undertake it. Pg 27
  • I prefer the ruins that I have not seen to those which I have. Pg 42
  • anything is better than stagnation. Pg 99
  • one-ideaed man is only one remove from a dead man. Pg 99
  • Misfortune brings the human spirit to a rare height, but the pendulum still swings. Pg 129

References:

Thursday, March 8, 2012

A Walk Along Land's End

Author: John McKinney
Edition: First Edition, Hardback, HarperCollinsWest
Read: March 2012
238 pages
Rated: 3 out of 5

Synopsis:
The book started as a walk for the California Coastal Trails Foundation—a group trying to map a plausible coastal trail for California. He gives this up to explore himself rather than write another guide book. He still has the thought in mind throughout the book.

What changed his emphasis from trail building and reporting was the destruction of the coast line. From the border with Baja California northward he founds significant places of development, and not just in the cities. This is a theme throughout the book from San Diego to Los Angeles, to Santa Barbara and northward to Santa Cruz and even on the Lost Coast. He dislikes the thought of even planned wilderness. He figures why plan the wilderness when it has been quite nicely for thousands of years?

So you get word pictures of what is so glorious about California and its coast and how we are spoiling paradise. He loosely follows the trail of his guide, the 1913 author Joseph Smeaton Chase and his book California Coastal Trails. You hear interesting stories of the area—both present and past.


Thoughts:
McKinney says this is not a guidebook, not even a guide to trails he was on, but more a guide to the path taken by my feet and by my heart. (xiii)

On the California coast, dry equals warm. (xvi)

McKinney meets up with two German tourists in Torrey Pines State Park. They ask the question, Why do you go? He is at a lost to answer the question. He then thinks and tells them that he came to get lost, lost in the palm and pine, lost for a time from metropolitan life, lost in the challenge of a long trail, lost in what remain of the will California coast. (28) Evidently this was not satisfactory to the tourists because they scurry off. But to me, this is similar to a quote from Randy Moregenson in the Last Season by Eric Blehm(314)--Here’s your one chance to get lost, fall in the creek, find a beautiful place.  Later on McKinney says that he goes to places like Torrey Pines because they celebrate life,... because they have been made by humands to set aside a place where we can see, feel and touch the living remnants of a once wild coastline. (30)

He talks about the inner conflict he feels, between wanting to put on the miles and the traveler who wants to experience. (33)

As he goes, he ponders Dana's and Chase's works and the land they describe in 1835 and 1912. He then realizes that even his more recent 1960's memories of an area are no more relevant 30 years later. I wonder what he would think now, 15 years after that? Particularly since McKinney is only 1 year older than me and I remember some of the same things he does. (42) Or even how I remember the mountains I visited as a youth.

He mets up with the family of Carl Ghormley, who not only walked all of the California beaches in 18 years, but started a significant charity to help Mexican children (died in 2005). As they were walking, the discussion turned to how his family related to the beach. He said that it was easy to walk and not see anything. You have to keep your senses open, seek it out, try to understand. (57) They then talk about how California seems to vanquish its history by ignoring it. Also they expressed their emotions about finishing their walk—a kind of sorrow at finishing the project. (59).

There is a chapter where he passes by his childhood area of Santa Barbara. He describes his feelings of seeing the tar and oil. He helped clean up birds from the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill and talks about how it turned him into a conservationist and distrustful of the influence money can bring to a situation. (88) In the book he talks about how he has been assured that a Santa Barbara oil spill cannot happen again since all sorts of precautions are taken. Of course, there is a tinge of doubt considering powerful men downplayed the damage inflected upon the wildlife of the area. Also this was written 14 years before the Gulf oil spill. You just wonder what McKinney thinks.

The ethics of how you live is woven in McKinney's story. Such as the Los Padres ranger who rather than give his tool to someone else to maintain, he sharpens it. The idea that specialization is not necessarily better. This ranger is a generalist in the age of specialists.

How to manage or a better phrase, let be the wild areas of our State is one of the central questions in the book. McKinney is afraid that wild areas will be managed and tamed by well meaning plans rather than setting apart wide areas and just letting it be.

Part of the trip is going through the Diablo Canyon area, where he was once arrested for trespassing and protesting. It is interesting reading his history of leading a group of fellow protesters through the wild to get arrested at a different place than the rest of the protesters. And then his take on seeing the area 15 years later. He is part of the ceremony opening the Pecho Coast Trail, paid for by PG&E.

In a way, McKinney asks a pertinent quest, Is the end of the big cone spruce the end of southern California?  (158) He had just commented on the the Big Cone Spruce is only found as far north as Santa Barbara County. But through out the book he broods on how we are doing away with what made California a paradise while putting up condo's, shopping centers and the like in our bid to develop everything.. He is very much of an advocate of creating a vision of the coastal use—not as a place to play, but as a living thing in which we are trusted with. (180)

I do love his description of the Russian Orthodox patriarch coming to Fort Ross. He gives a service there, commemorating 200 years of presence. Then at the close, he lights a cannon, with a boyish grin and is excited by the roar and flame.

Later on he talks about his relationship with religion. When he visits the redwoods of Northern California, he seeks out a place called the Redwood Monastery. They have tried to find a place in their lives by setting right relationships with God, man and the natural world around them. In the process, they have been able to purchase a sizable area of old growth redwoods for a place called Sanctuary Grove. He talks about how the Catholic church has been a sanctuary for refugees. This monastery looks at this mission as being a sanctuary for wildlife and nature. (224)

He also talks about a picture he saw there, Christ by Jamini Roy. It shows a transparent cross. McKinney's comment is that it is Christ which transforms us, not the cross. But it is his guide, Sister Diane who talks about neither the lumber company nor them, nor conservations who own the forest. Their goal is to ask, with Christ's blessing, mercy on for the earth. (226)

On McKinney's personal belief, he states that he is both a Christian and a conservationist, but one who does not believe in an Old Testament God.  He specifically signals out where God has intervened in the natural order of things—parting of the Red Sea and stopping of the sun for Joshua. He is a man who believes that God is out there and does not participate in this world. And yet we do see McKinney seeing Christ transforming us, not through the cross but through Christ. He does sound like someone whose belief system is not very well formed. (233)

But the part which attracts me is the tension he feels between his Christianity and his conservationism. He says that he can believe in a God which has ordered and given meaning to natural history. He also goes on and states that we cannot avoid our stewardship of the earth by either ignoring it or leaving it to God to handle. McKinney calls us to be part of the human drama of conservation and before calling on God. Where I part with McKinney is in a couple of places, not with the goals, but with what he sees as the relationship with God. I view this as a partnership with God, where we are stewards for him. So I do not see a tension here. I see the tension more with a fallen world of humanity and the mess we are in is because we do not have our purposes aligned with God's.

His conclusion is the that he has gone from exaltation—gladness of experiencing the beauty, and grandeur of what he has experienced. Then to the despair of where man has replaced nature with its shopping centers and parking lots—he uses the word desecration. Then to where he leaves us. The coast is a place in itself, not as a relationship with him.




Evaluation:
 McKinney succeeded in not making this a guide book as it is more of his thoughts as he travels the coast. So in that way, he is like John Muir and other people who tell of their travels and advocate the need for wilderness. Did it change my views? No since I am in the same camp. Will it move me to advocacy? Maybe. He is more heavy handed and his thoughts are too impressionistic for my tastes. But it has not been a waste of time of time to read. It gives me a better understanding of coastal issues, but maybe not how to advocate for them.



New Words:
  • paseo (34):  1. A leisurely stroll. 2. A place or path designed for walking. 3. A street or boulevard.
  • Pulaski (124): a single-bit ax with an adze-shaped hoe extending from the back
  • aeolian (135):  wind


Good Quotes:
  • Going to the mountains is going home. John Muir, San Francisco Bulletin, August 3, 1875
  • It seems to me we already spend too much time quantifying California and not enough time knowing it. (xv)
  • Old maps are best; they have more of the places I like to visit. Newer maps tell of bigger places, crowds and asphalt, geography I prefer to avoid. (xvii)
  • Why should sixteen be the only society-sanctioned age for rebellion? Like wine, rebellion tastes better with age. (37)
  • Improvise a trail at the right time in history and you're honored as a hero and get a plaque. Improvise a trail at the wrong time in history and you are threatened with arrest. (97)
  • Beauty itself is not heartbreaking. Beauty that's unobtainable, beauty that's defaces, will break your heart every time. (147)
  • I've always been more than a little uncomfortable with contemplating inner nature when there's so much outer nature around me. My ways have never been as interesting a study to me as nature's. (162)
  • We sly hikes know that just because a trail vanishes from the map doesn't mean it vanishes from the face of the earth. (163)
  • One meets out-of-the-way characters, naturally, in out-of-the-way places. (168)
  • roads now make the coast easier to reach, but harder to know. (169)
  • Prayer may be a far better defense against evil than cannon, but it's not nearly as much fun. (198)
  • We all need one place on the map, one place in our hearts that is lost. In a wild place, lost from the mean streets, we can find ourselves, our best selves. (219)
  • The growth of redwoods can be measured by counting their rings. By what measure can we determine the growth of human consciousness? (232)

References:
  • McKinney's website, The TrailMaster
  • Chase, Joseph Smeaton, California Coast Trails, Written in 1913
  • Dana, Richard Henry, Two Years Before the Mast, written 1835
  • Backbone Trail
  • California Coastal Trail
  1. Web Site
  2. Wikipedia
  3. California Coastal Commission

Thursday, January 19, 2012

The Life of Pi

Author: Yann Martel
Edition: eBook-Fresno County Library
Read: January 2012
342 pages
Rated: 3.5 out of 5


Synopsis:
Indian family has a zoo in a part of India which was occupied by the French. As the economy and Indian politics changes, the family is forced to sell the zoo and its animals. They decide to migrate to Toranto-some of the animals are also sold to the Toranto zoo. The family accompanies  the animals on the ship Tsimtsum. A few days out, the ship sinks. Pi is saved, along with a a zebra, orangutang, a hyena, and a tiger—Richard Parker. The story tells of his adventures with the animals and how Pi survived.

Spoil is at the end.

Thoughts:

Story starts from the perspective of an author. He relates how he was trying to write one story, but the story did not come together. As he was wandering about wondering what he would do, he comes across a person who knows another person who has a story which will make you believe in God. That is the story of Pi.

The story goes from the author meeting with Pi to Pi's story and back. At first the author gets interested in Pi's story. Then he starts to get interested in Pi. At one place, even though he is meeting in Pi's home, he belated becomes aware that Pi has a wife, then a family. He comments that “They were there all along, but I hadn't seen them because I wasn't looking for them.”  (103) So true—unless you want to see something, you usually do not see the elephant in the room.

In chapter 4, Martel talks about zoos. He says that an animal is very territorial. So the word freedom has no meaning to the animal. So being in a zoo, the animal feels no more restrictions than in the wild. How true is this? So Martel makes his pitch for good zoos. He points out that zoo animals do not escape to somewhere, but from something(54).

But then he goes on and compares the idea of freedom for humans. Do we really relish freedom? Do we roam around? Or do we keep to our territories—our homes for instance? Is this the reason why people like Chris McCandless (Into the Wild), Aron Ralston (Between A Rock and A Hard Place), Evert Ruess and Edward Abbey seem foreign to us? I like backpacking, but this is under a very controlled and prepared experience.

He then goes on and says that both zoos and religion share a common popular opinion—they are no longer in people's good opinion.(32) Pi's father is a symbol of this modern opinion. Pi sees the modern India as rich, modern and as secular as ice cream (86)—whatever that may be.

Pi's real name, Piscine, sound like the English word Piss, even though he was named after an elegant french swimming pool. Consequently, Pi gets ridiculed at school. When he changes schools, he decides to take the initiative—changes his name to Pi. When teachers ask what his name is, he says Pi and writes it on the board very forcefully. It is interesting how a math symbol brings peace and respite to him (37)

One of the themes of this book is how forceful can a person be? Is it better to be assertive? When Pi changes his name, he makes the name know in class, by not answering the question, “What is your name?”, but by marching to the blackboard and writing it down, saying it, giving the math symbol, the value and then getting reprimanded, not once, but eight times that day. But after that, there was no question of what his name was. Also as he talks about how relationships with zoo animals are established.  Then when he establishes his relationship with Richard Parker, he establishes himself as the alpha animal. This is pointed out that hostile and aggressive behavior on the part of animals—and I suspect humans is due to social insecurity. (59).

Obviously, when a person is shipwrecked, another theme will be survival. Since he is shipwrecked with several beasts, he at first is concerned with the animals. But as he realizes that his own survival is at stake, he loses empathy with them and focuses on his own. (144). This is probably true all the way around. It is the exceptional person who is concerned about others when they are suffering. He also loses his sense of time—he credits this as to why he survived. (218)

And it is this suffering which occupies Pi's mind, but not a lot of the book. He does not go over how he was raged with thirst or always hungry—he does talk about it, but does not incessantly dwell on it. He does comment how various Hindu gods suffered and are memorialized for it. He comments that his suffering is made in a grand setting(203), but there was no audience for it. Suffering is personnel—we can be moved by others suffering, but it is hard to take on another's suffering He feels his suffering does matter, even if it is personal.

Later on Martel notes that Pi realizes how hopeless his situation is. He is on a 26 foot boat with a Bengal tiger. Eventually the tiger will grow hungry and Pi will be the only source of food. As Pi realizes this, he loses hope. But instead of reacting with desperation, despair and depression, it gives him a new sense of energy. He thinks that he will not survive, so it frees him to think clearer and take measures which ultimately saves him. (160)

Ultimately, Pi realizes that he will die. He ponders that to die suddenly is terrible, but swift. But to die gradually with time to spare, you see what you are losing—the happiness you have had and would have had. (174) Do we see this as we live out our lives? Do we ponder where we are going? Or do we become numb and only live for now? Or do we cower in fear? He talks about fear and its effects (187) The mind will dismiss its greatest strengths—hope and trust (187), reason is too weak to stand. Where do you go for support and calmness?

Martel notes that a person can get used to anything, even killing(212). Consequently, one should never look at an act in isolation, but understand what came  previous to it.

There comes a place towards the end of his voyage where he encounters a mysterious, floating island. The island seems to be benign, but in reality has a dangerous element. Martel's description reminds me of a heinous version of CS Lewis' floating island. The description of an ungrounded island where there the plants are able to  extract the saltwater from the ocean through the plants. Martel's version has potentially dangerous side effect, instead of the Lewis version of an early Eden.

Martel writes an entertaining tale. It is a tale  which talks a lot of religion and how Pi wants to find a way to love God (89). First, Pi talks with an atheist—one of his teachers. Pi finds that the atheist is strong, loving and brave, but his outlook is rather bleak (37)  Pi respects this atheist, but is afraid that God will be destroyed by this man's words. Pi states, it is a terrible disease if it can kill God in a man. While a juvenile way to state it, it is a good way to say it. Pi does not want to lose his love for God. Is Pi's concern why we approach atheists with fear and belligerence? We are afraid the atheist will destroy the God living within us?

But it is also an interesting expression of God—living in us. I do not know about other religions, such as Hindu, if they have that thought. But Christianity does. He also says that faith in God is an opening up, a letting go, trust.

Martel does not have a place for agnostic thought. He says that doubt is ok for awhile, but not as a lifeline position. I take it that it is like voting. It is ok at the beginning of a presidential campaign to not know whom you are going to vote for, but if you still have that position after election day, you wasted the opportunity. The presidential analogy is my thought. See the quote below on transportation. But he does understand that reason can carry you only so far (120). There are limits to reason and there are some questions which get asked, but which never be answered. I think Martel feels that unless you understand this and make a good guess, you will always be on the fence. So eventually you need to move beyond fence sitting and plant yourself in a yard.

Chapter 16 opens with, we are all born Catholics—in limbo, without religion until some figure introduces us to God. This is an interesting statement. First, since he is using Catholics with a capital C, I assume he means the Catholic Church, not the holding things in common word. Does he mean that Catholics do not know their God or that they are godless? What do people become once they have found their god? He also does go on and say that he had been a Hindu all of his life (67) He does give an explanation of Hinduism---it is like a bank account where you are constantly depositing/withdrawing based upon your actions.

While he considers himself a Christian, Muslim, and Hindu, Pi sees problems in each. Such as he places in the mouth of his Hindu teacher, The proof of how bad Islam is, is how uncivilized Muslims are. (88) There is the obvious thought that Muslims generally are viewed as terrorists, fanatics. We know that is not altogether true. But how they have conquered their set of the world, it is not always by showing the light, but by force.

But the other thought which comes from that statement is the need for those who follow truth to act with both Truth and Grace. Martel sees the effect of forcing all to observe proper relations with God. That it leads to corruption of a system and obedience being the primary force, not the relationship with God. Martel asks, is this because God is weak and helpless? (91-see quote below).

Along with Martel's thoughts on our relation with God, he talks about the beauty of the gardens and flowers.(98) It raised the question, at least in my mind about beauty and its place in relationship with God. Should we worship God in beautiful situations or are they distractions? Is it better to worship in a sterile, aesthetic environment? After thinking about it, this is a false dichotomy. All things should lead us to God. Beauty can be a sign pointer, but it can be a distraction. Beauty is not to be worshiped.


Evaluation:

Do I believe in God? Which story do I believe? In some ways, the question which Yann Martel asks is how to evaluate the book. Does the book bring you closer to God? Is the story believable?

As for the first question, I do not think so. It seems more fictional than factual-by this, I mean the fiction really does not give that much insight into the operation of God. Martel asks a lot of questions, but has more of a universal, mish-mash of thinking towards who God is and how people should respond to God's love.

It is an interesting question about which story to believe. How do you form belief when there is no solid basis for belief. How do you know which story is right when there were no observers? Is either of the stories correct? Martel only raises the question, does not answer it, or even give clues.

Because of this, we are left with a book which raises good questions, tells a good story, in mostly a pretty good way, but not really any better than a dozen other modern books.

Notes from my book group:
I was not able to attend the meeting where this book was discussed. But it sounded like much of the group thought it was a good book.



New Words or people:
  • Luria, Isaac (14)-Pi's religious studies is in the cosmogony of this person
  • Cosmogony (14)- a theory or story of the origin and development of the universe, the solar system, or the earth-moon system.
  • Beebe(14)-Study of sloth's
  • Bullock(15)-Study sloths and decaying branches.
  • Tirler (15)-study of sloths
  • Thar Desert (34) region of rolling sand hills located partly in Rajasthan state, northwestern India
  • Apothecary (38)- one who prepares and sells drugs or compounds for medicinal purposes
  • Hediger (60)-place of intimidation  in the social order of animals.
  • Pandit (88)
  • Wallah (89)
  • R.K. Narayan (94)
  • Sri Ramakrishna (96)
  • Morarji Desal (101)
  • zoomorphism (107) 1. the conception or representation of deities in the form of animals 2. the use of animal forms or symbols in art, literature, etc
  • dyspeptic (123) Of or having indigestion or consequent irritability or depression.
  • durian (146)
  • chandlers (166)
  • Diwali (168)
  • masala dosai (168)
  • oothappam (168)
  • dorados (179)
  • prusten (189)
  • oestrous (189)
  • lassi (247)
  • gaff (298)
  • meekrats (300)

Good Quotes:
  • Those we meet can changes us, sometimes so profoundly that we are not the same after wards, even unto our names. (33)
  • There are no grounds for going beyond a scientific explanation of reality and no sound reason for believing anything but our sense experience (41). (This is Martel's statement of rationalism and scientific thought.)
  • Doubt is useful for a while. We must all pass through the garden of Gethsemane. (42)
  • To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. (42)
  • All living things contain a measure of madness that moves them in strange, sometimes inexplicable ways. This madness can be saving; it is part and parcel off the ability to adapt. (55)
  • Animals that escape go from the known into the unknown—and if there is one thing an animal hates above all else, it is the unknown. (55)
  • There are always those who take it upon themselves to defend God, as if Ultimate Reality, as if the the sustaining frame of existence, were something weak and helpless. (91)
  • people fail to realize that it is on the inside that God must be defended, not on the outside. (91)
  • Religion is about our dignity, not our depravity. (92)
  • Long term, bad politics is bad for business. (102)
  • Why can't reason give greater answers? Why can we throw a question further than we can pull in an answer? (120)
  • When your own life is threatened, your sense of empathy is blunted by a terrible, selfish hunger for survival. (144)
  • To be drunk on alcohol is disgraceful, but to be drunk on water is noble and ecstatic. (169)
  • I must say a word about fear. It is life's only opponent. (187)
  • Life is a peephole, a single tiny entry onto a vastness. (204)
  • Time is an illusion that only makes us pant. (218)
  • Faith in God is an opening up, a letting go, a deep trust, a free act of love. (241)
  • At moments of wonder, it is easy to avoid small thinking, to entertain thoughts that span the universe, that capture both thunder and tinkle, thick and thin, the near and the far. (272)
  • It's important in life to conclude things properly. Only then can you let go. (317)

References:














Spoiler:

But the story has a third part where representatives of the ship talk with Pi after his survival. They tell a different story—one where a cook, Pi's mother, a sailor and Pi survive the shipwreck in a lifeboat. The question which Pi asks the representatives is, which story do you prefer?